• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    This invention relates to a method and a device for averting and damping rolling of an engine-driven marine vessel with propeller propulsion, The proposed method recognizes the fact that the speed controller of a ship responds to heel angle variations by propeller speed adjustments, A speed controller is reading such propeller moment change as speed variations to be corrected. By the recurrence of this process, the result is amplifying small rolling effects to a critical rolling.. Further elements contribute to this process, such as the propeller side effects ship's hull contact with the sea, waves or winds. However, by suppressing the interaction between heel angle variations and the speed controller, the rolling of a ship can be effectively reduced and averted. The proposed method, by suppressing the cause of the critical rolling, reduces rolling, fuel consumption and maintenance of the ship's propulsion engines.
    公开号:SE1130084A1
    申请号:SE1130084
    申请日:2011-09-16
    公开日:2013-03-12
    发明作者:George Fodor；Tomas Lindqvist；Arne Loefgren
    申请人:Tagg R & D Ab Q；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    Figure 2 illustrates a typical configuration (according to the prior art) of a ship's speed control with associated actuators and sensors.
    Figure 3 schematically illustrates the configuration of a device for avoiding rolling and damping of rolling in accordance with an exemplary embodiment. Figure 4 illustrates a flow chart for the various steps in the method of avoiding rolling and damping of rolling in accordance with an exemplary embodiment. Figure 5 illustrates critical rolling of a ship when the device for avoiding and damping rolling is not in operation Figure 6,7,8,9 and 10 illustrate examples of reactions of the rolling damping in different exemplary embodiments of the principle for avoiding and damping rolling Known Art The following known technology is referred to in this document: (PA1): Methods and devices for preventing rolling (PA2): Control devices for speed and load of the propulsion machinery PA1- Methods and devices for preventing rolling (current technology) Passive devices for preventing rolling such as Pendulum keels use frictional energy to divert one ship's milling energy. Active roll damping devices are more efficient than passive ones due to the use of specialized actuators, controlled by regulators, which inject energy to counteract the rolling forces.
    Today often used actuators to dampen rolling are fen stabilizers.
    An automated roll damping method is presented in H.H. Dow's U.S. Patent No. 1,731,236, issued October 15, 1929, and No. 1,774,825 of September 2, 1930 (Dow's patent). Dow's patent describes the use of one or two propellers as roll damping actuators by counterbalancing a ship's heeling angle using the torque from one propeller or the resulting torque from two propellers. Furthermore, the patents describe a mechanical arrangement for said compensation.
    An embodiment of a control system using 1930s technology.
    PA2 - Control devices for speed and load of a ship's machinery (background technology) The ship's speed and load control device has the task of maintaining the machinery's speed and load within a predetermined working range. Consequently, the speed of the vessel can also be kept within a predetermined speed range.
    Figure 2 schematically shows the components of a traditional speed and load control device for a diesel machinery. A speed setpoint device 300 is used to set the desired speed to value n *. Usually it is an operator or an automatic navigation system that delivers said setpoint. The current speed n of the machinery is obtained from the speed sensor 314. The speed comparator 302 subtracts the current speed of the machinery from the setpoint. The resulting speed difference dn is applied to a speed controller 304. The output of the speed controller is the setpoint p to a fuel supply device 310. A fuel pump comparator 306 subtracts the current level of fuel injection p, which is read by the sensor setpoint for fuel 12. The resulting difference dp is the input signal to the fuel regulator 308 which manipulates the fuel device 310 via a power control signal fc.
    The fuel device directs the fuel injection to the diesel machinery 316 so that the speed n follows the setpoint n *. For the classic diesel engines, the fuel device is a mechanical actuator, while for a Common Rail fuel system the fuel device consists of an electronic control unit belonging to the engine.
    Propulsion arrangements with diesel-electric machinery work in the same way with the difference that electric generators and electric motors are located between the diesel machinery and the propeller, and that it is the electric motor that is speed controlled.
    DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT An arrangement for avoiding and damping rolling of a propeller-driven vessel is described below in accordance with a preferred embodiment.
    Arrangement of the Preferred Embodiment As shown in Figure 3, the arrangement of the previously described control device PA2 is improved by additionally including the functionality for avoiding and damping rolling. A marine vessel can be equipped with a number of machines and propellers. For simplicity, only one machine and one propeller are described in this embodiment.
    A ship corresponding to the preferred embodiment comprises a machine 316 which drives the ship's propulsion propellers 318. An operator or a navigation control system provides the ship's speed reference via the speed setpoint 300 to the ship's speed and load control device 334.
    The arrangement according to the preferred embodiment consists essentially of the device for avoiding and damping rolling 320 (the RAD device) which is integrated in the ship's speed and load control unit. Inputs to the RAD device consist of at least: (1) sampled signals from one or more sensors used to evaluate the ship's rolling characteristics and (2) input information on the technical and physical characteristics of different devices in the arrangement. The outputs from the RAD arrangement are commands and parameters to the speed controller.
    In the preferred embodiment, the sensor used to determine the scroll characteristics is an inclinometer 322 which gives the current scroll angle Q.
    Information on the ship's characteristics is provided via an operator interface and / or via a parent computer 324. Properties of interest include the ship's natural oscillation period T s, transverse moment of inertia J s and the ship's roll damping coefficient Q '. Properties of interest where the machinery constitutes power Pe, nominal speed nn and the moment of inertia of the machinery Je. Properties of interest for the speed and load control unit are the control gain k and the time constants for the fuel device and controller Tc. In the proposed embodiment, this information is assumed to be known from technical specifications or from tests during the operation of the ship. In an alternative embodiment, this information could be determined by identifying parameters of a dynamic model.
    The step-by-step method The various steps of the proposed embodiment in accordance with Figure 4 are performed repeatedly with constant time interval T sample to ensure a sufficient number of sensor readings for each roll period. A suitable range for T sample varies from tens to hundreds of milliseconds. A typical rolling period is between 10-30 seconds.
    Step 1. The RAD device 320 reads the inclinometer 322 to determine the current tilt angle of the vessel 49. The value is stored in the RAD device and is available for further calculations.
    Step 2. Using previous readings of the angle of inclination, the RAD device determines the amplitude Ar and the period time Tr of the ship's rolling. There are many known methods for determining the amplitude and period time of the fundamental tone of a sampled signal, e.g. by discrete Fourier transform, curve fitting or zero crossing.
    In the proposed embodiment, the following zero-crossing algorithm is proposed: The RAD device measures a number of heeling angles recorded during a time interval corresponding to the ship's natural rolling period and determines the previous maximum rolling angle, Hmax, and the previous minimum rolling angle Hmín in the set of sampled values. The time interval between two consecutive zero crossings of the roll angle is set to Tzero. The rolling amplitude can now be calculated as Ar = (Hmax-Hmín) / 2 and the rolling period Tr as Tr = 2 * T zero.
    Step 3. During this step, the RAD device determines the trend of the rolling amplitude and the rolling period over the interval Ttrend (trend time). The size of the T trend depends on the type of vessel and the requirement for speed precision. An appropriate value is the ship's rolling period multiplied by a small integer. For example, if the ship's natural rolling period is Ts = 20 seconds, a suitable range for Ttrend may be between 20 and 200 seconds. During the trend period, the vessel undergoes several rolling periods whose amplitude and period trend can be characterized as follows: The trend for the amplitude Ar is characterized as belonging to one of the following categories: Low, Stochastic, Constant, Increasing or Decreasing.
    The trend for the target period Tr is characterized as belonging to one of the following categories.
    Stochastic, Constant or Natural. Stochastic means that the rolling period Tr and the rolling amplitude Ar, respectively, are not regular. 'Konststanf means a rolling period that is different from the ship's natural rolling period. “Natural means a rolling period that is identical to the ship's natural rolling period. “Low means that the amplitude of the scroll is low.
    The trends described above apply to the preferred embodiment. Alternative embodiments may have a different trend designation compared to the preferred embodiment, such as your types of intervals or a continuous working range.
    Step 4. The RAD device 320 uses the rolling period and rolling amplitude together with the dynamic characteristics of the ship as well as the machinery properties obtained via operator interface 324 to establish a control algorithm and speed control parameters that effectively avoid and dampen rolling and also maintain the ship's preset speed. The algorithm for speed control according to the prior art which has no roll damping is called NS. As will be described later in the Algorithm section, the preferred embodiments are two types of algorithms that avoid and attenuate ship rolling: (1) using constant speed (CS) and inverted control (IC). IC has a stronger rolling-reducing effect compared to CS and can be used to dampen stronger rolling.
    The preferred embodiment describes a number of rules for selecting the correct algorithm for different types of roll reduction and roll damping shown in Table 1.
    TABLE 1 Roll period Tr Stochastic Constant Natural 5 Low or NS NS NS: E dn = large Lä Stochastic CS CS CS E Constant CS CS IC Decrease CS IC IC Increase Cs IC IC For example, as can be seen in the first row of the table: If the scroll amplitude is 'Low or the speed difference dn is large, rule NS normal speed control according to known technology is used. If the scroll period is 'Constant' (second column) and the scroll amplitude is 'Increase' (the fifth row), the stronger the rule IC (inverted control) is applied to dampen them increasing the scroll. If the scroll period is Stokastic (second column) and the amplitude has a decreasing trend (fourth row), the constant speed algorithm CS is used. The other cells in the table should be interpreted in the same way. Consequently, an appropriate algorithm is selected to attenuate and avoid rolling for each prevailing condition.
    Step 5. In this step, the RAD device 320 activates the selected algorithm in the speed controller 304.
    The above method steps are repeated cyclically beginning with step at the next Tsample time.
    The steps described above can be varied in alternative embodiments according to the following: - A sensor can measure the heeling angle 9 and the first resp. the second derivative of 6 during step 1, in such a way that a more accurate evaluation of rolling amplitude and rolling angle can be made in Step 2.
    Step 1 and Step 2 can be joined using a sensor that directly outputs values for scroll angle and scroll amplitude.
    - In Step 3, the scrolling trend can be coded with a poor resolution. The rules can also be implemented with Blurred Logic, Artiicial neural networks, Smith predictors or with other corresponding methods.
    In Step 4, one, two or two of your algorithms for avoiding and attenuating rolling can be used.
    At step 4, depending on the type of vessel and preferences with respect to roll damping, other rules in alternative embodiments may be used.
    Algorithm Rolling of a ship is caused by a combination of forces such as: - Engine torque - Ship hull interaction with water - Propeller interaction with water - Rudder interaction with water flow Some of the following explanations apply to ships with one propeller and others to ships with two or fl are propellers. For vessels with fl er propellers and for azimuth propellers, it is assumed that each propeller has its own speed control system.
    The speed controller determines the output torque of the machinery. Said torque increases or decreases depending on (a) the ship's speed, (b) the propeller's rotational speed, (c) variations in the ship's heeling angle, (d) the rudder's interaction with the water flow from the propeller, (e) changes in the ship's yaw angle and (f) interaction between waves and ship hulls.
    The phenomena described below, individually or in combination, contribute to the development of a critical rolling that can be described as a correlation between the dynamics of the speed controller, the ship's specific rolling period and the dynamics of the waves. The state constitutes a driven harmonic oscillation.
    (Fl) Reactive torque effects on the hull of the propeller.
    The torque of the propulsion machine is mainly converted into longitudinal trust.
    However, a small part creates a torque and a reaction moment between the propeller and the surrounding water mass. This torque is transmitted from the propeller to the hull. The torque is proportional to the power of the propulsion machinery. Higher speed of the ship means a higher torque on the propeller according to a close square relationship.
    (F 2) Longitudinal moment created by the propeller When the ship tilts fl, the propeller moves to the side of the ship's center line. This gives the propeller's trust a torque that turns the vessel in the same direction as it tilts.
    Consequently, as the ship rolls, it will have a path that gradually alternates between starboard and port side of the steered course.
    (F3) Torque created by an irregular fl fate around a heeling ship's hull For a ship with a heeling angle of zero fl, the water surface symmetrically on the starboard and port sides. A heeling vessel has an irregular water gap around the hull. In accordance with Bernoulli's principle, the pressures on the starboard and port sides will be different. An inclined vessel has hydrodynamic properties that are inferior to one on a straight keel.
    The result is more towing resistance that causes a reduction in the ship's speed and an increase in the torque of the propeller. The speed sensor (314) registers a decrease in the propeller speed. The speed controller (304) increases the torque of the machinery to restore the correct speed. This will increase the uneven water fate in such a way that the ship tends to change course. This further increases the heeling angle sensed by the inclinometer (322) and, as a result, increases the torque of the machinery again. A continuous process occurs where equilibrium finally arises thanks to compensatory correcting moments and frictional moments. The torque of the machinery increases non-linearly with the heeling angle, thus a self-sustaining rolling occurs which is modeled by a near square function. This effect is found in vessels with both one and two propellers.
    (F4) The effect of hull propulsion on the interaction between propeller and water Literature describing ship handling describes a number of effects that create lateral movements of the stern due to uneven fate through the propeller blades: the wake effect, the slope effect, the helical effect and the squat effect. These effects are caused by differences in water fate between the starboard and port sides of the ship's propeller. Aft transverse motion creates change in controlled course which in turn creates a lateral centripetal force that increases the heeling angle. These effects occur only on ships with a propeller.
    (FS) The effect of the inclination of the hull on the interaction between propeller and water Rolling torque created by changes in the course (rotation) of a ship. A vessel with mass m having a linear velocity v, has a kinetic energy that can be expressed as Ek = mv2 / 2. A ship can swing due to either a rudder movement or one of the effects described above. During such a turn, the vessel is tilted by a lateral centripetal force. Thus, some of the kinetic energy is converted into energy that tilts the ship.
    (F6) Forces excited by waves The ship's dynamics in calm water are different compared to the conditions in rough seas when the angle of attack of the waves against the ship's hull must be taken into account.
    In calm weather, machinery / propellers have a stable speed. The rudder is in the middle position and the torque tilts the ship, in the opposite direction relative to the propeller rotation. Depending on the size of the vessel, weight and water relativt relative to the hull, the angle of inclination will be in the order of 0.5-2 degrees. The angular velocity of the slope is 0. In rough seas or in waves, the reaction of the ship and its speed regulator is different due to the dynamic effect of the waves on the ship's hull. Waves bounce back and forth against the ship. When the ship tilts, the water resistance becomes higher and the ship tends to turn as described above under points (P3) and (FS) and the rudder is turned out to compensate for the incipient turn. All three of these processes cause drag resistance and slow down the ship. Thus, the machine power increases as the rolling angle increases.
    Furthermore, the transverse speed and angular velocity of the hull increase or decrease the load of the machinery: - The engine load increases when the vessel rolls from port to starboard side (if the propeller rotates clockwise).
    - The machine load decreases when the ship rolls from starboard to port side.
    This variation is superimposed on the load variation caused by the ship's speed variation.
    The rotational speed and load of the machinery, hence the torque, will vary. The load variation causes the machinery speed controller to increase or decrease the fuel index (312) in order to maintain the required speed.
    (F7) Rudder forces The attacking waves cause a course error. The autopilot's course regulator will then change the rudder position so that the course error is corrected. Corrections made by the course control system can also increase or decrease the heeling angle and thus the machine load.
    (F8) Interaction from the speed control In the following, we will show quantitatively how the ship's speed regulator generates and maintains the rolling of a ship.
    The rolling of a propelled ship can be determined by the solution of a system of equations that models the dynamics of the heeling angle as the interaction between speed control, engine torque and ship inertia. One possible such system of differential equations for the preferred embodiment is: ø '= 2w. 11 - 1 k = -T-Fk + Af) (Ez) C The equation (El) can be written equivalent with explicit terms such as: (Ä: 2wskql - Zws - æfø + må cos (27r TiM W El consists of the following terms: T1 .
    T2.
    T3.
    T4.
    TS. ß is the second derivative of the heeling angle, ie. heeling angle acceleration ~ Zçwsçl is a damping factor that depends on the shape and condition of the hull. where ç is a damping constant that is specific to a ship's design and hull condition, cos is the angular velocity of the heel that corresponds to the ship's natural oscillation period scaled by the ship's moment of inertia, and is the speed of the rolling angle. - cofçó is the righting torque that gives the ship stability (see Figure 1) Zwskdf is a factor that tilts the ship via the speed control and the resulting engine / propeller torque. The dynamics in this moment depend on the variation of the factor k of the machinery speed and load control device 334, which is determined by the gain and time constant of machinery 316, speed controller 304, fuel controller 308 and fuel device 310. This variation is modeled in the differential equation lt = Ti (-k + A452) (E2) which expresses the delay and L magnitude of the speed control engagement. In this equation, TC is the combined time constant for the activation of the controller and machinery and AC is the gain factor of the speed controller. Both TC and AC are parameters that can be adjusted via the speed controller 304 within certain limits. In (E2) the quadratic factor øz expresses the non-linear relationship between the torque of the machinery and the heeling angle. cofv cos (2 fl TM is a factor that describes the effect of the waves. TW is the period of time of the vagomas W and of: is the amplitude of the waves is scaled with the moment of inertia of the vessel. For the RAD device this factor acts as a disturbance. For an alternative 12 embodiment, wave parameters are identified, measured or obtained from commercial sources for the prediction of marine waves and winds.
    If the surface area described by the term T4 and / or T5 is greater than the damping part of the equation, the ship's rolling will be maintained and reinforced. In practice, this is often the case with modern vessels equipped with powerful machines and / or cargo vessels with little correcting torque.
    If no waves occur, then the velocity and load control device 334 provides no delay and then equation (El) is reduced to a Van der Pol equation known to generate critical oscillations. If there are waves with a period time that is half of the ship's natural period time, the term (auf - mä cos (27r Tl fi ø) W describes a typical Mathieu-type parametric scroll.
    The essence of the proposed method is to avoid a build-up by manipulating the parameters of the speed controller which are returned in the right-hand side of the differential equation (E1) in such a way that the acceleration, velocity and value of the heeling are effectively reduced. This includes, but is not limited to, one of the following methods: M1. Increase in response time T c at the machinery speed controller. This reduces the term T4 and the rolling ceases to be maintained by the ship's machinery.
    M2. Reduction of the gain of the speed controller to a value that does not create critical oscillations.
    M3. Generation of speed variations of the propulsion machinery inserted at the right moment in such a way that term (T4) counteracts the variations in the heeling angle.
    This means a control approach with the opposite sign.
    M4. Any other speed control method which reduces the variation in the heeling angle as a model predictive control and which utilizes the integral of the heeling angle over a rolling period as a cost function.
    M5. Any equivalent method that minimizes the integral of the heeling angle variation by controlling the parameters of the speed controller. The preferred device described by the method steps shown in Figure 4 describes two methods for reducing and attenuating rolling: 1) The constant speed algorithm (CS) which can be implemented by the method M1 or M2 described above. 2) Inverted control (IC) that can be implemented according to algorithm M3, M4 or M5.
    The methods described above for reducing the non-linear term are associated with disturbances in the speed and course of the vessel which must be compensated for. Accordingly, the proposed method also includes appropriate compensation of the speed of the vessel described in the Method Step section.
    The method for avoiding rolling damping and damping described in this application is fundamentally different from the method described in Dow's patent No. US 1, 731236, described in the prior art section (P1).
    This and other similar rolling damping patents focus on a new rolling damping actuator - in this case the propeller - which was unknown in this function before the 1930s.
    In contrast, the method and device proposed by us utilizes the fact that during rolling a variation in the speed of the vessel occurs which is reflected as a variation in the torque of the propeller. The speed control function senses the variation and normally the ship's rolling is maintained and amplified through a recurring process.
    The method proposed by us diverts the critical rolling by breaking the critical connection between the propeller's torque and the ship's speed control function.
    All alternative devices presented are essentially variations and modifications that use the same described principle for avoiding and damping rolling without departing from the scope of the proposed invention as defined in the appended claims. 14 Example Example 1. Figure 5 shows a critical roll of a ship according to equations (E1) and (E2) when the avoidance and damping device (RAD) is not activated.
    The vertical coordinate is heeling angle (in degrees) and the horizontal coordinate time (in seconds). The natural rolling period is 20 seconds and the time constant of the Speed and Load Control device is 1 second. The gain regulator gain is 80. A high value that maintains a critical roll.
    Example 2. Figure 6 shows the effect of using an algorithm variant with a lower gain factor M2, for the same vessel parameters as in Example 1. The chosen algorithm means a reduction of the gain factor from 80 to 75. It can be seen that scrolling still occurs, but it is attenuated after about 9 periods.
    Example 3. Figure 7 shows the effect of using algorithm variant M1 of method CS for the same vessel parameters as in Example 1. The speed constant of the speed controller has been increased from 1 second to 50 seconds and the gain factor is again 80 which gave critical scrolling.
    It appears that a stronger attenuation is achieved in comparison with the situation in Example 2.
    The rolling is damped after about 7 periods. The speed control is more affected in comparison with what is the case in Example 2 because the speed control does not react until after 50 seconds.
    Example 4. Figure 8 shows the effect of using algorithm variant M3 of method CS for the same vessel parameters as in Example 1. The time constant of the speed controller is again 1 second, but the gain is now -5 0, i.e. inverted regulation. It appears that an even stronger attenuation is achieved in comparison with the situation in Example 3.
    The rolling is eliminated after about 4 periods at the price of a possible larger deviation in the Speed Control for 80 seconds.
    Example 5. Figure 9 shows a critical roll of the parametric roll type obtained from equation (E1) when the waves are characterized by Kw = 56 and Tw = Ts / 2 = 10 seconds.
    The parameters of the speed controller are the same as in Example 1. Example 6 Figure 10 shows a damping effect of the parametric scrolling shown in Example 5. The algorithm is inverted control (IC) with a gain of -30.
    The damping is not so strong, but parametric rolling is a safety risk and there are no simple effective methods for damping available. Consequently, any attenuation achieved is valuable.
    权利要求:
    Claims (14)
    [1]
    A method shown in Figure 4 for the avoidance and damping of rolling of a marine ship with propulsion by means of a speed-controlled propeller characterized by, sensing the current angle of inclination of the ship. Calculation of values characterizing the behavior of the ongoing ship rolling: the trend of rolling amplitude and rolling period through the use of a sequence of sensed tilt angles using each model describing the ship's rolling behavior as an interaction between, the dynamics of machinery / propeller caused by (a) the ship's speed control, (b) the influence of induced moment from machinery / propeller on the ship's inclination and (c) the effect of waves, on the ship's angle of inclination Selection of a control algorithm, based on said model of the ship's rolling that avoids and dampens the critical interaction between speed controller and machinery - propeller interaction and thereby achieve avoidable damping and damping of rolling.
    [2]
    A method according to claim 1 characterized by, A sensor for the ship's rudder position to characterize the ship's rolling behavior. Use of the measurement from said sensor in addition to a method to avoid and attenuate the critical interaction described in Claim 1.
    [3]
    A method according to claim 1 or 2 characterized by, Sensing the current angle of attack and amplitude of the waves and the wind angle and strength relative to the ship with the intention of characterizing the ship's rolling behavior. Using any or all of said measurements to calculate suitable method to avoid and dampen the critical interaction described in Claim 1
    [4]
    A method according to claims 1, 2 and 3 characterized by, - Characterization of the rolling behavior by predicting future variations in heeling angle, wave attack values, wind angles and course values based on either previous current measurements or by using information generally available in marine applications intended to predict said parameters: Weather reports, wave and wind reports, satellite-based positioning systems, etc. - The use of any / some or the above-mentioned predictions for the calculation of an appropriate method to avoid and attenuate the critical interaction described in Claim 1
    [5]
    A method according to any, some or all of the preceding claims, characterized in that the control algorithm described in Claim 1 is based on an increase in the response time of the propulsion machinery speed regulator in such a way that the propeller speed response is considerably slower than the rolling period. In this way, no critical interaction occurs and no scrolling is maintained
    [6]
    A method according to any, some or all of Claims 1-4, characterized by, - - That the control algorithm described in Claim 1 is based on lowering the gain factor or inverting signs of the gain factor of the ship's speed controller. In this way, no critical interaction occurs and no scrolling is maintained
    [7]
    7. A method characterized by, f »
    [8]
    A method according to any, some or all of Claims 1-4, characterized by. The method of breaking said critical interaction is based on influencing the speed controller of the machinery in such a way that a speed function is generated which minimizes the critical rolling. Model-based predictive controllers can calculate such linear functions. There are also other equivalent methods. A function to minimize operating costs uses the amplitude of the measured heeling angle and the vessel's speed variations. In this way, no critical interaction occurs and no scrolling is maintained
    [9]
    A method according to any, some or all of Claims 1-4, characterized by, A compensation of the speed variation caused by the methods described above, by inter-sequencing traditional speed control with the algorithm for avoiding rolling damping and damping. This requirement includes all optimization methods that balance the timing of the intersequencing in accordance with a cost optimization function such as the ship's fuel consumption
    [10]
    A computer program containing program code for performing the required steps in any of the methods according to Claims 1-9
    [11]
    A data medium consisting of at least a part of a computer program according to Claim 10
    [12]
    A device for interpreting the data medium in accordance with Claim 11. characterized in that the control output of this device controls the ship's speed control device.
    [13]
    A device for interpreting the data medium in accordance with Claim 11. characterized in that the control output fi of this device controls the input for fuel setpoint on the machinery's Fuel Control Device.
    [14]
    A device for interpreting the data medium in accordance with Claim 11. characterized by, - That the control output from this device controls the input for speed setpoint on the speed controller of the machinery
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    SE1130084A1|2013-03-12|Method and apparatus for avoiding and attenuating the rolling of a ship
    EP2536998B1|2018-07-25|Active adaptive gyrostabiliser control system
    US9195234B2|2015-11-24|Dynamic positioning systems and methods
    CA3045003A1|2018-06-07|Control system for a floating wind turbine structure
    US20080167768A1|2008-07-10|Control system for a vessel with a gyrostabilization system
    Khaled et al.2011|A dynamic model and a robust controller for a fully-actuated marine surface vessel
    US10077098B2|2018-09-18|Control method for anti-roll stabilization of watercraft, and corresponding stabilization system and computer program product
    Townsend et al.2013|Control strategies for marine gyrostabilizers
    Tsukada et al.2013|An auxiliary thruster for free-running model ship test
    Chuang et al.2013|Speed loss of a vessel sailing in oblique waves
    EP2093552A1|2009-08-26|Method of and device for determining propeller efficiency on board of a ship
    Lind et al.2014|Simulation and control of submarines
    Steenson et al.2011|Maneuvering of an over-actuated autonomous underwater vehicle using both through-body tunnel thrusters and control surfaces
    JP6487365B2|2019-03-20|Ship automatic steering system
    Araki et al.2019|Improved maneuvering-based mathematical model for free-running ship motions in following waves using high-fidelity CFD results and system-identification technique
    CN102959216A|2013-03-06|Ship engine control device and ship engine control method
    Dash et al.2016|Roll-induced bifurcation in ship maneuvering under model uncertainty
    Patil et al.2021|A time-domain method for analyzing the ship roll stabilization based on active fin control
    CN109050818B|2020-03-10|Ship rolling reduction method based on multiple propellers
    Sclavounos2006|Intersections between marine hydrodynamics and optimal control theory
    Li2016|Numerical Simulation of Turret Moored Ship Performance in Variable Ice Drift Based on Heading Control
    Fjellvang2018|Adaptive Vertical Motion Control System for a Surface Effect Ship
    Hart et al.2007|Seakeeping analysis of the lifting body technology demonstrator sea flyer using advanced time-domain hydrodynamics
    Bayless et al.2020|Joystick Steering in Recreational Boats Using L1 Adaptive Control
    Quadvlieg et al.2015|Maneuvering predictions for fast monohulls in early design stage
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    WO2013039445A1|2013-03-21|
    CN103813958A|2014-05-21|
    KR101980367B1|2019-05-20|
    DK2748060T3|2018-07-23|
    SE535979C2|2013-03-12|
    US9145191B2|2015-09-29|
    KR20140061547A|2014-05-21|
    JP6195122B2|2017-09-13|
    EP2748060A4|2016-03-02|
    EP2748060B1|2018-04-25|
    JP2014531360A|2014-11-27|
    US20140316620A1|2014-10-23|
    CN103813958B|2017-10-03|
    EP2748060A1|2014-07-02|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    US1821242A|1928-08-18|1931-09-01|Old Colony Trust Company|Gaseous conduction apparatus|
    US1774825A|1928-09-04|1930-09-02|Dow Chemical Co|Method of stabilizing ships|
    FR2053697A5|1969-07-15|1971-04-16|Polouektoff Jean Paul|
    JPS6067300U|1983-10-17|1985-05-13|
    NL8902595A|1989-10-19|1991-05-16|Rietschoten & Houwens Elek|DEVICE FOR STABILIZING A VESSEL.|
    DE19537989A1|1995-10-12|1997-04-17|En Umwelt Beratung E V I|Determining and quantifying dynamic sea state influence on power variations of ship drive system|
    JP2004009785A|2002-06-04|2004-01-15|Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd|Wave prediction fluctuating reduction method and its apparatus|
    NL1023921C2|2003-07-15|2005-01-18|Quantum Controls B V|Active pendulum damping system for ship movements.|
    DE10355052B4|2003-07-19|2006-11-02|Dallach, Gert, Dr. Ing.|Stability determination of ships|
    NO320465B1|2004-02-16|2005-12-12|Egeland Olav|Procedure and system for testing a regulatory system of a marine vessel|
    JP4262127B2|2004-03-30|2009-05-13|Ｊｆｅソルデック株式会社|Parametric roll prevention device|
    US20080183341A1|2006-08-22|2008-07-31|Neu Wayne L|Method and apparatus for torque control for machinery using counter-rotating drives|
    CN100568141C|2008-03-20|2009-12-09|北京航空航天大学|A kind of unmanned machine rolling leveling control method|
    WO2010118752A1|2009-04-14|2010-10-21|Danmarks Tekniske Universitet|Prediction of resonant oscillation|
    NO20093007A1|2009-09-16|2011-03-17|Kongsberg Seatex As|Fartoybevegelser|WO2015072895A1|2013-11-18|2015-05-21|Ab Volvo Penta|A method for controlling a boat comprising a pivotable drive unit, and a electronic vessel control unit for steering a boat|
    CN105022861B|2015-06-11|2018-05-22|北京精密机电控制设备研究所|A kind of carrier rocket definite method of squash type servo-drive system oil storage|
    CN105468046B|2016-01-08|2017-08-11|中国船舶重工集团公司第七0四研究所|The many branched power local vibration control methods of ship basic propulsion system|
    EP3494039B1|2016-08-05|2021-04-14|ZF Friedrichshafen AG|Sailboat steering system and method for steering a sailboat|
    CN107140110B|2017-03-21|2019-07-09|山东省科学院海洋仪器仪表研究所|A kind of ship large-amplitude roll kinematic nonlinearities damped coefficient recognition methods|
    CN110753894A|2017-06-15|2020-02-04|Abb瑞士股份有限公司|Controlling a vessel|
    NO345528B1|2018-12-20|2021-03-29|Kongsberg Maritime CM AS|Vessel environment condition assessment system and method|
    CN109850082B|2019-04-12|2020-04-10|北京虹湾威鹏信息技术有限公司|Unmanned ship self-righting method|
    US11175663B1|2021-03-15|2021-11-16|Sea Machines Robotics, Inc.|Automated marine navigation|
    法律状态:
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    SE1130084A|SE535979C2|2011-09-16|2011-09-16|Method and apparatus for avoiding and attenuating the rolling of a ship|SE1130084A| SE535979C2|2011-09-16|2011-09-16|Method and apparatus for avoiding and attenuating the rolling of a ship|
    PCT/SE2012/050955| WO2013039445A1|2011-09-16|2012-09-11|Method and device for averting and damping rolling of a ship|
    DK12831107.3T| DK2748060T3|2011-09-16|2012-09-11|Method and apparatus for avoiding and attenuating the rolling of a ship|
    JP2014530628A| JP6195122B2|2011-09-16|2012-09-11|Method and apparatus for avoiding and braking ship roll|
    US14/211,547| US9145191B2|2011-09-16|2012-09-11|Method and device for averting and damping rolling of a ship|
    EP12831107.3A| EP2748060B1|2011-09-16|2012-09-11|Method and device for averting and damping rolling of a ship|
    KR1020147010183A| KR101980367B1|2011-09-16|2012-09-11|Method and device for averting and damping rolling of a ship|
    CN201280045080.1A| CN103813958B|2011-09-16|2012-09-11|Method for the rolling for the ship that prevents and decay|
    [返回顶部]