• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    The invention relates to a flight data exploitation system for optimizing the operations of an aircraft, comprising: - an acquisition circuit (3) configured to collect observation data (D1-Dn) relating to a set of aircraft, and - a processing circuit (5) configured: - to assign quality values (Qi) to said observation data by applying to them according to their contexts corresponding predetermined learning models (M1-Mn) , thereby generating observation data enriched with quality values, and - for analyzing said observation data according to their quality values in order to optimize the operations of the aircraft.
    公开号:FR3046268A1
    申请号:FR1563183
    申请日:2015-12-23
    公开日:2017-06-30
    发明作者:Julien Alexis Louis Ricordeau；Alexandre Anfriani；Aurelie Gouby；Jerome Henri Noel Lacaille
    申请人:SNECMA SAS；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    AIRCRAFT FLIGHT DATA OPERATION SYSTEM TECHNICAL FIELD
    The present invention relates to the field of operations of an aircraft and more particularly, the automatic validation and the exploitation of flight data making it possible to optimize the operations of an aircraft.
    STATE OF THE PRIOR ART
    The data recorded during the flight of an aircraft are generally used to verify the proper operation of the various equipment of the aircraft.
    This data is for example used to monitor the engine of the aircraft to detect any anomalies. Indeed, they can be used to analyze the behavior of the engine during the ignition process, to analyze its thermodynamic performance, to detect clogging filters, to analyze oil consumption, etc.
    Flight data recordings may contain abnormal or corrupt data, for example due to an anomaly, software modification, power failure, or equipment failure. In this case, the data recorded during the flights of a set of aircraft can not be effectively exploited to advocate improvements in the operability of the aircraft.
    Moreover, the measurements are very varied and depend greatly on the evolution context of the aircraft. Moreover, because of the high frequency of the flights, the volume of data is too important for the quality of these data to be manually verified. The object of the present invention is therefore to provide a system for automatically verifying the quality of flight data and the exploitation of quality data in order to make recommendations for operational uses making it possible to improve the operations of the data. aircraft.
    STATEMENT OF THE INVENTION
    The present invention is defined by a flight data operating system for optimizing operations of an aircraft, comprising: an acquisition circuit configured to collect observation data relating to a set of aircraft, and a processing circuit configured: - to assign quality values to said observation data by applying to them according to their contexts corresponding predetermined learning models, thus generating observation data enriched with quality values, and - for analyzing said observation data according to their quality values in order to optimize the operations of the aircraft.
    Thus, the enrichment of the observation data by the quality values makes it possible to use own observation data to make precise analyzes of the maneuvers that are made to the aircraft and / or to improve the precision monitoring tools.
    Advantageously, the processing circuit is configured: - to calculate a residual between the value of each observed data item and the corresponding value provided by the learning model, and - to calculate the quality value of the observation data item by comparing said residual to an error value allowed by the corresponding learning model.
    Advantageously, each observation data item having a quality value below a predetermined threshold is either weighted, corrected, or discarded.
    According to a first example of the type of processing, the observation data includes measurements of aircraft ground run times and internal temperature measurements of the aircraft engines. In this case, the processing circuit is configured to optimize the operations of the aircraft by determining a distribution of grounding time according to the internal temperatures of the engines for a fleet of aircraft.
    In another example, the observation data includes temperature measurements at the aircraft engine inputs during the phases in which said engines are at a standstill. In this case, the processing circuit is configured to optimize the operability of the aircraft by determining a temperature distribution at the engine inputs of a fleet of aircraft.
    In a third example, the observation data includes fuel consumption measurements and control parameter measurements. In this case, the processing circuit is configured to optimize the operations of the aircraft by determining a distribution of fuel consumption according to the piloting parameters of an aircraft fleet.
    Advantageously, the distribution of grounding time, and / or the temperature distribution at the inputs of the engines, and / or the distribution of fuel consumption is (are) correlated (s) to a total consumption and / or wear material on a flight.
    This makes it possible to make recommendations on the durations of passage of the aircraft on the ground, on the choices of allocation of aircraft on roads with more or less severe environments, on the parameters of piloting of the aircraft for an operability and optimum fuel consumption.
    Advantageously, the system comprises an operating database configured to store the observation data enriched with quality values. The invention also relates to a method for exploiting flight data to optimize the operability of an aircraft, comprising the following steps: - acquiring observation data relating to a set of aircraft, - assigning quality values said observations data by applying to them, according to their contexts, corresponding predetermined learning patterns, thereby generating observation data enriched with quality values, and - analyzing said observation data according to their values of quality in order to optimize the operability of the aircraft. The invention also relates to a database comprising observation data enriched with quality values created according to the operating method of the present invention.
    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Other features and advantages of the system and method according to the invention will emerge more clearly on reading the description given below, by way of indication but without limitation, with reference to the appended drawings in which: FIG. . 1 schematically illustrates a flight data operating system for optimizing the operations of an aircraft, according to a preferred embodiment of the invention; FIG. 2 schematically illustrates an example of a method of constructing learning models, according to one embodiment of the invention; FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a method for determining quality values and enriching observation data, according to a preferred embodiment of the invention; FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating an example of an observation data item with respect to the data item of the corresponding training model; FIG. 5 schematically illustrates a method of exploiting the enriched observation data, according to an embodiment of the invention; and - FIG. 6 schematically illustrates an example of exploitation of observation data relating to a specific indicator, according to one embodiment of the invention.
    DETAILED PRESENTATION OF PARTICULAR EMBODIMENTS
    Fig. 1 schematically illustrates a flight data operating system for optimizing the operations of an aircraft, according to a preferred embodiment of the invention.
    The operating system 1 comprises an acquisition circuit 3 and a processing circuit 5.
    More particularly, the operating system 1 is installed in a ground station 7 and comprises a computer system 9 comprising the acquisition circuits 3 and processing 5 as well as storage units 11 and the usual input peripherals 13 and It will be noted that the storage units 11 may comprise computer programs comprising code instructions adapted to the implementation of the data exploitation method according to the invention. These computer programs can be executed by the processing circuit 5 in relation with the storage units 11 and the acquisition circuit 3.
    During each flight, each aircraft 17 proceeds to the collection and recording on on-board storage means, parameters or data of observations relating to the mission. These data are derived from measurements or specific data acquired by sensors or on-board computers giving indications on physical or logical elements of the equipment of the aircraft 17 and in particular of its engines. In general, the data are temporal data and dependent on the flight conditions of the aircraft. By way of example, the observation data include measurements of the ground running times of the aircraft, measurements of the internal temperatures of the engines, measurements of temperatures external to the air intake of the engines, measurements fuel consumption, steering parameters, etc.
    The observation data of each aircraft can be discharged regularly, for example after each flight (arrow Al), to be retrieved by the operating system 1.
    It should be noted that some of this data can also be transmitted (arrow A2) by the aircraft at the ground station in real time. Indeed, during each flight, an aircraft 17 sends information on its operation according to for example a message system called Aircraft Communication Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) or any other means of communication for transmitting information. Usually, these data are retrieved by the ground stations in real time to be processed immediately in the case of obvious anomalies and otherwise to be archived with all the data of the aircraft fleet. Additional data stored in the embedded systems can also be downloaded manually.
    The observations data relating to a set of aircraft collected by the acquisition circuit 3 are then stored in a coherent manner in the storage units 11.
    According to the invention, the processing circuit 5 is configured to assign quality values or scores to the observation data by applying them, according to their contexts, corresponding predetermined learning models. In other words, the processing circuit 5 confronts each observed data item with a learning model adapted according to the context or phase of flight in order to generate observation data enriched by quality values.
    It will be noted that an observation datum is generally associated with a parameter or temporal observation signal recorded during a flight and consequently, the corresponding quality value is also temporal (ie represented by a time quality signal) .
    In addition, it should be noted that a learning model is a model created from the data considered healthy (see Fig.2). An example of construction of learning models is described by Seichepine et al, in the article entitled "Data mining of flight measurements". More particularly, this document describes a method of constructing learning patterns for detecting anomalies. The method focuses only on anomalous data and reveals no enrichment of observed data.
    In contrast, the processing circuit 5 of the present invention scans each observation data in order to assign a value of quality thereby automatically validating quality data and easily exploitable. By way of example, the quality value can be calculated according to a transfer function associating an inaccuracy with each observation data in response to an inaccuracy of the corresponding data provided by the learning model.
    Alternatively, the quality value may be calculated by an adequacy indicator defining the measurement of a distance between the observation data and the corresponding prediction of the learning model. The adequacy indicator makes it possible to verify the use of adequate data, that is to say, which resemble those used during the learning process. In other words, it is a distance from the original data used to build the model. Examples of quality indicators are described by patent FR2957170 of the applicant.
    Advantageously, the processing circuit 5 estimates the quality values by implementing an algorithm using a multi-agent type of technology. In this case, each agent takes care of a particular context of measurements and is only interested in a subset of observation data. The agents are then automatically organized by skills. Thus, when new data arrives, the most competent agents will be used, for each time segment, to perform a data quality analysis. The final decision procedure is obtained by merging the most competent agents on each data segment. Finally a quality value is assigned to each observation data.
    Alternatively the agent population can evolve with the arrival of new data, to refine their already established skills or to build others. In this case, the processing circuit implements a genetic type learning algorithm.
    It should be noted that more conventional filtering tools can also be used to analyze the quality of the data.
    Moreover, the observation data enriched by the quality values are advantageously stored in an operating database 12. More particularly, when setting up the observation data, a specific quality value is attributed to each of the data. The operating database 12 then contains the quality information enabling the processing circuit 5 to analyze the observation data according to their quality values in order to optimize the operations of the aircraft or to increase the accuracy of the monitoring tools. The operation of the aircraft is understood to mean the maneuvers that are made to the aircraft.
    Indeed, thanks to the enriched operating data, the processing circuit 5 can exploit quality observation data (not tainted by erroneous data) to make statistical analysis or data mining with a very high degree of accuracy. high accuracy. The results of the analyzes include, for example, specific recommendations for the improvement of the maneuvers on an aircraft and / or the improvement of the monitoring tools. Indeed, just by avoiding low quality data, the accuracy of monitoring tools will be automatically increased.
    Fig. 2 schematically illustrates an example of a method of constructing learning models, according to the invention.
    Indeed, during a learning phase, we build models that will then be used to determine the quality values for all the observation data. Step E1 uses a filter F1 to filter learning data by transforming discrete data into continuous signals and eliminating data that is obviously outliers, for example, outside the physical limits of the measured quantity. Step E2 concerns an unsupervised classification of the variables. Indeed, in the data recorded in flight on an airplane, there exists a very large number of variables (a few thousand) among which many are redundant or equivalent and thus it is question here of selecting the most representative variables for the construction of the models .
    A predetermined measure (e.g., a mutual information measure) is used to calculate the distances between the two-to-two variables to define subsets ei-en of homogeneous variables related to one another. Then, each subset is enriched by new variables created by nonlinear transformations on its initial variables in order to extract a representative base of the subset. This makes it possible to keep all the information with as few variables as possible and to predict each of the variables by virtue of the other variables belonging to the same subset. Step E3 concerns the construction of the different Mi-Mn learning models from a variable representative of each subset ei-en. This construction can be carried out according to for example the LASSO technique.
    Advantageously, the learning models are Gaussian models built according to the different phases of flight. Indeed, an aircraft engine generally operates in the same way in well-defined flight phases comprising the following phases: engine start, taxi, takeoff, climb, cruise, approach, landing, reverse, and engine stop. Step E4 concerns the estimation for each Mi-Mn learning model of the parameters of an associated Eri-Ern error model. Each Eri-Ern error model indicates the errors that can be accepted or tolerated by the corresponding learning model. An example of a calculation of error models is explained by Seichepine et al, in the article entitled "Data mining of flight measurements".
    Fig. 3 schematically illustrates a method for determining quality values and enriching observation data, according to a preferred embodiment of the invention. In step Eli, the processing circuit 5 is configured to apply to each new observation data D, recorded during the flight, the learning model M, the most relevant according to the flight phase.
    Indeed, during the learning phase, the Mi-Mn models were built according to the different phases of flight knowing that it is not possible to build a single Gaussian model on all phases of flight. Each variable behaves differently depending on the context or phase of the flight during which it is observed. In step E12, the processing circuit 5 is configured to calculate a residual R, between the value of each observation data item D recorded and the value provided by the corresponding learning model M. In other words, the processing circuit 5 calculates the error made by the observed data with respect to the learning model. In step E13, the processing circuit 5 is configured to estimate the quality value Q, of the observation data item D, by comparing the residue R, with an error value En tolerated by the learning model M, corresponding. In other words, the processing circuit 5 compares the error R, of the data D, observed with the error En (defined by the error model) admitted by the learning model and assigns a value of quality Q, in function of the difference between these two errors. A small difference means that the data observed is of good quality and therefore the quality value Q, corresponding is great, whereas a large difference between the two errors means that the data observed is of poor quality and therefore the quality value Q, attributed is small. Note also that a strong error in extrapolation is not always pledge of non quality of the data tested: indeed, the agent itself can have a limit of competence.
    Thus, the quality value Q can simply be equal to the distribution function of the absolute value of the residue.
    As a variant, in the case where it is considered that the error model In is a Gaussian model and the residue R follows a folded normal distribution, the quality value Q, then corresponds to the absolute value of the residue.
    The quality value Q can thus be simply defined by a quality score between 0 and 1. A score of value 1 indicates that the data is very good while a score of 0 indicates that the data is erroneous.
    Fig. 4 is a graph illustrating an example of an observation data item with respect to the data of the corresponding learning model.
    The curve C1 corresponds to the mean value defined by the learning model and the tolerance or confidence tube t1 corresponds to the standard deviation of this value. Curve C2 represents the observation data. As long as the observation data C2 is inside this confidence tube tl, it is considered good. Indeed, the quality value Q, is large when the observation data is close to the average value of the learning model and low in the opposite case. This example shows that at the moment 5000 and during a small interval 11 (vertical band), the observation data C2 leaves the confidence tube t1 and in this case, the quality value Q, on this interval 11 is very weak. (almost zero). Moreover, outside this interval 11 for which the associated quality value will therefore be close to 0, the two curves C1 and C2 are almost merged, the associated quality value will therefore be close to 1. In step E14, the processing circuit 5 is configured to add to each observation data item D, its value or quality score Q, thus generating enriched observation data. In step E15, the processing circuit 5 is configured to store the enriched observation data by the corresponding quality values in the operating database 12.
    Fig. 5 schematically illustrates a method of exploiting the enriched observation data, according to one embodiment of the invention. In step E21, the processing circuit 5 is configured to define relevant indicators 21, 23 relating to specific elements or tasks or maneuvers of the aircraft.
    In fact, it is possible to define, from the observation data, indicators specific to physical elements indicating a particular element of the engine or aircraft or logical elements indicating a task or specific situation of a whole set of elements of the engine. engine or aircraft. By way of example, an indicator may correspond to a statistical distribution of the time of passage of aircraft on the ground, internal temperatures of aircraft engines, external temperatures of aircraft engines, fuel consumption, time required for a motor achieves maximum acceleration during each start, temperature gradients of the engine exhaust gases, etc. In step E22, the processing circuit 5 is configured to acquire from the operating database 12, the enriched observation data in relation to the interest indicator defined in the previous step.
    In steps E23 and E24, the processing circuit 5 is configured to automatically validate the enriched observation data.
    More particularly, in step E23, the processing circuit 5 is configured to compare the quality value Q, of each observation data item D, with a predetermined threshold S. In step E24, the processing circuit 5 is configured to discard the observation data having a quality value below the predetermined threshold in order to exploit only those having a value of quality higher than this threshold. Thus, only the data of good quality are exploited.
    According to a first variant, at least part of the observation data having a value of quality below the predetermined threshold are corrected according to expert criteria. Indeed, it is advantageous to use the largest possible number of observation data.
    According to a second variant, the observation data are weighted according to their corresponding quality values. By way of example, each observation datum may be assigned a weight equal to its quality value. In step E25, the processing circuit 5 may advantageously be configured to standardize the observation data so that it is independent with respect to the external context. This step is optional and may apply to some of the observation data.
    Indeed, each measurement collected during a flight mission is performed in particular external or internal conditions. These conditions that may have an impact on the reading of the indicators can be measured and recorded as exogenous data. External conditions may include external temperatures and pressures, the attitude and relative speed of the aircraft, the place of flight (over the sea, the desert, the land, etc.), the location of the airport, weather conditions (rain, snow, frost, etc.), humidity, etc. The internal conditions may concern the specific use of the engine (shaft speed, exhaust gas temperature, fuel type, etc.). As an example of exogenous data, the oil temperature just before the start of the engine can be considered as a context data that differentiates two types of starts (cold start or warm start).
    Standardization is based in particular on a stage of normalization of endogenous variables according to a regression model. It should be noted that in order to improve the results of the regression model, additional variables constructed from calculations using initial exogenous variables can be considered to form a set of context variables.
    Thus, the normalization can be carried out according to a generalized linear regression model defined on a space of context variables generated by analytic (polynomial and / or non-polynomial) combinations of the exogenous variables. In step E26, the processing circuit 5 is configured to construct the indicator of interest from the possibly standardized observation data relating to the indicator. In step E27, the processing circuit 5 is configured to make statistical analyzes on the indicator in order to propose recommendations for operational use of the aircraft to optimize their operability. For example, the recommendations can be represented in the form of graphics or formulated as "best practices".
    Fig. 6 schematically illustrates an example of exploitation of observation data relating to a specific indicator, according to one embodiment of the invention.
    According to this example the indicator provides information on the distribution of grounding time as a function of the internal temperatures of the engines. This distribution can be carried out for a fleet of aircraft, by aircraft, by airport, etc.
    More particularly, in step E31, the processing circuit 5 acquires the Di-Dn observation data comprising the measurements of the ground running times of the aircraft and the measurements of the internal temperatures of the aircraft engines. Step E32 is a test performed on each of the observation data D, acquired in the previous step. If the quality value Q, of a current data item is less than a threshold value S (for example equal to 0.7), the processing circuit 5 does not take into account the data and the test is repeated for a next data item. . On the other hand, if the outcome of the test is negative (i.e., the quality value of the current data is greater than S), then we go to the next step E33.
    Steps E33 and E34 define the following loop: as long as the joystick 25 of the aircraft is in the ground idle ground position and as long as the internal engine temperature is greater than 650 ° C, then a counter is incremented. This information is calculated for each engine, for each aircraft and for each flight. In step E35 the processing circuit 5 displays on a screen the distribution of the time spent on the ground for internal engine temperatures above 650 ° C for an entire fleet, by aircraft, by airport, by day, etc. In step E36, the processing circuit 5 is configured to correlate the distribution of the time spent on the ground with malfunctions or with the performance of the engines of the aircraft.
    Thus, in step E37 thanks to the correlations of the previous step, the processing circuit 5 is configured to help make operational use recommendations intended to optimize the operations of the aircraft.
    According to a second example, the indicator may correspond to a distribution of external temperatures to the ground.
    In the same way as in the previous example, the processing circuit 5 acquires the observation data comprising measurements of the external temperatures on the ground.
    Indeed, for a given aircraft, as long as the aircraft is on the ground and the engines are stationary (ie zero engine speed), the external temperature To at the engine inlet is recorded by the aircraft (for example in an ACMS type system linked to the FADEC). This data may be corrupted at the acquisition level (sensor fault, harness, connectors) or data transmission. Thus, the processing circuit gives a lower quality value in case of data corruption. For example, for an acquisition on an engine aircraft stopped before a flight (during a time interval [t1, t2]), the quality value is calculated for each acquired value of To over [t1, t2] and is added to the operating database.
    The processing circuit 5 determines the input temperature distribution for an entire fleet, by aircraft, by airport, by day, etc. Finally, the processing circuit analyzes this distribution to see the influence of external ground temperatures on the operation of the engine to make recommendations for operational use to optimize aircraft operations.
    According to a third example, the indicator may correspond to a distribution of fuel consumption depending on the driving parameters.
    In the same way as in the previous examples, the processing circuit 5 acquires the observation data comprising fuel consumption measurements and control parameter measurements. Then, the processing circuit determines the distribution of fuel consumption according to the driving parameters. Finally, the processing circuit analyzes the distribution to make recommendations for the operational use of the aircraft in order to achieve fuel savings.
    Advantageously, the processing circuit 5 is configured to follow, for a set of aircraft, the parameters recorded during the flight and the correct application of the recommendations in order to quantify what would have been the employment impacts of such or such recommendation on a given flight.
    权利要求:
    Claims (9)
    [1" id="c-fr-0001]
    A flight data operating system for optimizing operations of an aircraft, characterized in that it comprises: an acquisition circuit (3) configured to collect relative observations data (Di-Dn); to a set of aircraft, and - a processing circuit (5) configured: - to assign quality values (Qj) to said observation data by applying to them according to their contexts learning models (Mi-Mn corresponding predetermined ones, thereby generating observation data enriched with quality values, and - for analyzing said observation data according to their quality values in order to optimize the operations of the aircraft.
    [2" id="c-fr-0002]
    2. System according to claim 1, characterized in that the processing circuit (5) is configured: - to calculate a residual between the value of each observed data item and the corresponding value provided by the learning model, and - to calculate the quality value of the observation data item by comparing said residue with an error value allowed by the corresponding training model.
    [3" id="c-fr-0003]
    3. System according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that each observation data having a quality value below a predetermined threshold is either weighted, corrected or discarded.
    [4" id="c-fr-0004]
    System according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the observation data include measurements of aircraft ground run-times and internal temperature measurements of the aircraft engines, and that the The process is configured to optimize aircraft operations by determining a ground-time distribution based on engine internal temperatures for a fleet of aircraft.
    [5" id="c-fr-0005]
    5. System according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the observation data comprise temperature measurements at the aircraft engine inputs during the phases when said engines are stopped, and in that the circuit process is configured to optimize the operations of the aircraft by determining a temperature distribution at the engine inputs of a fleet of aircraft.
    [6" id="c-fr-0006]
    System according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the observation data comprise fuel consumption measurements and control parameter measurements, and in that the processing circuit is configured to optimize the operations. of the aircraft by determining a distribution of fuel consumption according to the piloting parameters of an aircraft fleet.
    [7" id="c-fr-0007]
    7. System according to any one of claims 4 to 6, characterized in that the distribution of time of passage to the ground, and / or the temperature distribution at the inputs of the engines, and / or the distribution of fuel consumption is ( are) correlated with a total consumption and / or wear of the equipment on a flight.
    [8" id="c-fr-0008]
    8. System according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that it comprises an operating database configured to store the enriched observations data quality values.
    [9" id="c-fr-0009]
    9. A method of operating flight data to optimize operations of an aircraft, characterized in that it comprises the following steps: - acquiring observation data relating to a set of aircraft, - assigning values of quality (Qi) to said observation data by applying to them according to their contexts corresponding predetermined learning patterns, thereby generating observation data enriched with quality values, and - analyzing said observation data according to their quality values to optimize the operations of the aircraft.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    FR3046268A1|2017-06-30|AIRCRAFT FLIGHT DATA OPERATION SYSTEM
    CA2826608C|2019-01-08|Monitoring of an aircraft engine for anticipating maintenance operations
    CN102246110B|2014-12-03|Standardization of data used for monitoring an aircraft engine
    EP3039497B1|2018-08-29|Monitoring of an aircraft engine to anticipate maintenance operations
    EP2912526B1|2017-12-06|System for monitoring a set of components of a device
    EP3097455B1|2019-02-20|Method for predicting an operational malfunction in the equipment of an aircraft or aircraft fleet
    EP3008531B1|2019-07-31|Methods of creating a database and of formulating a map of operating states of aircraft and a method of monitoring the operation of an associated aircraft
    EP2376989A1|2011-10-19|Identification of defects in an aircraft engine
    FR2963448A1|2012-02-03|METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ANALYSIS OF FLIGHT DATA RECORDED DURING THE FLIGHT OF AN AIRCRAFT.
    EP2627982A1|2013-08-21|System for monitoring an engine test bed
    WO2016075409A1|2016-05-19|Method for monitoring an aircraft engine operating in a given environment
    FR2991486A1|2013-12-06|METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ASSISTANCE IN FOLLOWING MISSION OF AN AIRCRAFT
    EP3517442A1|2019-07-31|Method for detecting freezing conditions for an aircraft by supervised automatic learning
    FR3035232A1|2016-10-21|SYSTEM FOR MONITORING THE HEALTH CONDITION OF AN ENGINE AND ASSOCIATED CONFIGURATION METHOD
    EP3281157B1|2021-03-17|System for mutualizing aircraft engine data
    EP3871078A1|2021-09-01|Computing environment system for monitoring aircraft engines
    FR3095424A1|2020-10-30|System and method for monitoring an aircraft engine
    EP3929006A1|2021-12-29|Method and device for estimating the state or the pressure of the tyres of an aircraft
    EP3923104A1|2021-12-15|Method and system for controlling a damage level of at least one part of an aircraft, associated aircraft
    WO2021069824A1|2021-04-15|Apparatus, method and computer program for monitoring an aircraft engine
    FR3075417A1|2019-06-21|METHOD OF ESTIMATING THE SURFACE CONDITION OF A TRACK OF AERODROME
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    US20170185937A1|2017-06-29|
    FR3046268B1|2019-05-10|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    US6480770B1|1999-04-01|2002-11-12|Honeywell International Inc.|Par system for analyzing aircraft flight data|
    US20130274964A1|2012-04-16|2013-10-17|Flight Data Services Limited|Flight data monitoring and validation|
    FR2570201B1|1984-09-10|1987-01-09|Aerospatiale|METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN AERODYNE WITH A MOTOR, SUCH AS AN AIRCRAFT, IN THE RISING PHASE ADAPTED TO OPTIMIZE THE OPERATING COST OF SAID AERODYNE|
    US20120152007A1|2007-01-12|2012-06-21|Richard Holmes|Testing performance of a material for use in a jet engine|
    FR2957170B1|2010-03-03|2015-04-17|Snecma|DESIGN TOOL FOR A SYSTEM FOR MONITORING AN AIRCRAFT ENGINE|
    FR2970358B1|2011-01-06|2019-04-12|Airbus Helicopters|PROGNOSTIC OF DURATION BEFORE MAINTENANCE BY FUSION BETWEEN MODELING AND SIMULATION, FOR ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENTS ON BOARD IN AN AIRCRAFT|
    US8600917B1|2011-04-18|2013-12-03|The Boeing Company|Coupling time evolution model with empirical regression model to estimate mechanical wear|
    CN102416821A|2011-07-27|2012-04-18|中国国际航空股份有限公司|Aircraft system data processing method|
    US20130199571A1|2011-11-10|2013-08-08|Reaction Systems, Llc|Novel thermal method for rapid coke measurement in liquid rocket engines|
    US10248742B2|2012-12-12|2019-04-02|University Of North Dakota|Analyzing flight data using predictive models|
    US10665114B2|2014-03-28|2020-05-26|The Boeing Company|Aircraft fuel optimization analytics|
    GB201412444D0|2014-05-30|2014-08-27|Airbus Operations Ltd|System and method for providing an optimized aircraft turnaround schedule|
    FR3040801B1|2015-09-09|2017-08-25|Thales Sa|OPTIMIZING THE TRACK OF AN AIRCRAFT|
    US9911339B2|2015-11-05|2018-03-06|Ge Aviation Systems Llc|Experimental real-time performance enhancement for aircraft|US10838983B2|2015-01-25|2020-11-17|Richard Banister|Method of integrating remote databases by parallel update requests over a communications network|
    WO2019186594A1|2018-03-29|2019-10-03|Zestiot Technologies Pvt. Ltd.|Method and system for auto task allocation & recommending ground equipment, manpower to improve turnaround time of aircrafts in airport|
    CN109785462A|2019-01-21|2019-05-21|南京航空航天大学|Aircraft oil consumption computing system|
    CN109830001A|2019-01-23|2019-05-31|北京邮电大学|A kind of Data Quality Assessment Methodology and device|
    FR3101669A1|2019-10-07|2021-04-09|Safran|Aircraft engine monitoring device, method and computer program|
    法律状态:
    2016-12-05| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 2 |
    2017-06-30| PLSC| Publication of the preliminary search report|Effective date: 20170630 |
    2017-11-21| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 3 |
    2018-09-14| CD| Change of name or company name|Owner name: SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES, FR Effective date: 20180809 |
    2019-11-20| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 5 |
    2020-11-20| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 6 |
    2021-11-18| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 7 |
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    FR1563183A|FR3046268B1|2015-12-23|2015-12-23|AIRCRAFT FLIGHT DATA OPERATION SYSTEM|
    FR1563183|2015-12-23|FR1563183A| FR3046268B1|2015-12-23|2015-12-23|AIRCRAFT FLIGHT DATA OPERATION SYSTEM|
    US15/388,185| US20170185937A1|2015-12-23|2016-12-22|Aircraft flight data evaluation system|
    [返回顶部]