MILLING TOOL WITH INCREASED ROUGHNESS

专利摘要:
The invention relates to a milling tool (20) characterized in that it comprises an elongated body (22) having a longitudinal axis (26) and a plurality of cutting inserts (24) coupled to the body (22) and spaced apart along the longitudinal axis (26), each cutting insert (24) having a cutting edge (24), the cutting edges (24) having an oblique orientation with respect to the longitudinal axis of the elongated body ( 22).
公开号:FR3042996A1
申请号:FR1660446
申请日:2016-10-27
公开日:2017-05-05
发明作者:David Alan Stephenson；David Alan Ozog；David Garrett Coffman
申请人:Ford Motor Co；
IPC主号:

专利说明:

DESCRIPTION
The present invention relates to milling inserts, for example to increase the roughness during interpolation milling. Generally, gasoline and diesel engine block bores are machined with close dimensional tolerances and surface finishes to ensure compression and proper oil retention. In the conventional method, after removal of the molding template, the bores are machined by means of a multi-step boring operation to control the dimensions, and then finished by a lapping operation to control the finish of surface. The boring operation generally comprises three independent steps: rough bore, semi-finished bore, and finished bore. Each step usually requires a tool with a fixed diameter. In addition, finishing boring tools typically require a post-processing diameter gauge and a compensation tool adjusting head to maintain a consistent diameter as the tool wears. Each boring step requires about 10 to 15 seconds per boring cycle. After machining, the break-in operation also generally comprises three steps. The first step, normally referred to as a roughing-in pass, can be directly compromised by the size of the rough roll and the surface finish after finishing boring. This conventional approach can produce high quality bores, but can be relatively inflexible and require a significant investment in machine tools.
In at least one embodiment, the present invention relates to a milling tool. The milling tool may include an elongated body having a longitudinal axis; and a plurality of cutting inserts coupled to the body and spaced along the longitudinal axis, each cutting insert having a cutting edge; the cutting edges having an oblique orientation with respect to the longitudinal axis of the elongated body.
In one embodiment, each cutting edge has a first end and a second end, the first end having a greater cutting radius than the second end. The first end may be an upper end of the cutting edge, and the second end may be a lower edge of the cutting edge, or vice versa. The cutting radius of the first end may be greater than that of the second end by at least 5 μπι or 10 μπι. In one embodiment, the orientation of the cutting edges is adjustable.
In at least one embodiment, the present invention relates to a milling tool. The milling tool may include an elongated body having a longitudinal axis; and a plurality of cutting inserts coupled to the body and spaced along the longitudinal axis, each cutting insert having a cutting edge; the cutting edges being offset from the longitudinal axis of the elongate body by an offset angle of 0.01 to 0.5 degrees.
In one embodiment, the cutting edges are offset from the longitudinal axis of the elongated body by an offset angle of 0.03 to 0.2 degrees. The cutting edges may be offset from the longitudinal axis of the elongate body such that each cutting edge has a first end and a second end and the first end has a greater cutting radius than the second end. In one embodiment, the offset angle is adjustable. The cutting edges may each be offset by the same offset angle.
In at least one embodiment, the present invention relates to a milling tool. The milling tool may include an elongated body having a longitudinal axis; and a plurality of cutting inserts coupled to the body and spaced along the longitudinal axis, each cutting insert having a cutting edge; cutting edges having a mean roughness (Rz) of at least 7.5 μm.
In one embodiment, the cutting edges may have an average roughness (Rz) of at least 10 μm. The cutting edges may have an average roughness (Rz) of 12 μm to 25 μm. In one embodiment, the cutting edges have a profile including an alternation of projections and depressions. A pair of cutting inserts may have alternating projections and offset depressions. The cutting edges may have a sinusoidal profile, such as a triangular waveform or sawtooth waveform. In one embodiment, the cutting inserts are of tungsten carbide or cubic boron nitride. The invention will be better understood thanks to the detailed description which follows and which is based on non-limiting examples illustrated in the appended figures in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic cross section of a boring operation for shaping a motor bore;
Fig. 2 is a schematic cross section of an interpolating milling operation for shaping a motor bore, according to one embodiment;
Fig. 3 is a schematic cross section of a tapered motor bore shaped by an interpolation milling operation, according to one embodiment;
Fig. 4 is a schematic cross section of a cylindrical motor bore after a roughing-in operation according to one embodiment;
Fig. 5 is a flow diagram of a conventional three-step boring operation for shaping a motor bore;
Fig. 6 is a process diagram of an interpolating milling operation for shaping a motor bore according to one embodiment;
Fig. 7 is a schematic cross section of a milling tool having a constant cutting radius, the distribution of forces and the resulting motor bore wall, according to one embodiment;
Fig. 8 is a schematic cross-section of a milling tool having an adjustable cutting radius, the distribution of forces and the resulting motor bore wall, according to one embodiment;
Fig. 9 is a perspective view of a milling tool having adjustable cutting inserts, according to one embodiment;
Fig. 10 is an enlarged view of the adjustable cutting inserts of Fig. 9, according to one embodiment;
Figure 11 is a plot showing the diameter of a plurality of bores as a function of depth, including a bore shaped by means of a milling tool having adjustable cutting inserts;
Fig. 12 is a plot showing the bore diameter of a plurality of cut bores by means of a milling tool having adjustable platelets;
Fig. 13 is a plan view of a textured cutting edge of a cutting and milling insert, according to one embodiment;
Fig. 14A is an example of a sinusoidal profile for a textured cutting edge, according to one embodiment;
Fig. 14B is an example of a square wave profile for a textured cutting edge, according to one embodiment;
Fig. 14C is an example of a triangular wave pattern for a textured cutting edge, according to one embodiment;
Fig. 14D is an example of a sawtooth wave pattern for a textured cutting edge, according to one embodiment; and
Fig. 15 is a schematic side view of a milling tool having adjustable inclined cutting inserts, according to one embodiment.
Detailed and non-limiting embodiments of the present invention are described below: however the described embodiments are given by way of example only and may be implemented in various alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily scaled; some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. Therefore, the specific structural and functional details described in the present invention should not be interpreted as restrictive, but only as a representative basis for teaching the skilled person to employ the present invention in different ways.
Referring to Figure 1, a conventional boring operation used to shape a motor bore 10 is illustrated. The motor bore 10 may be formed in a molded motor block (eg, a cast iron or compact graphite cast engine block) in a cast iron jacket inserted into an aluminum engine block. or in magnesium, or in a coated aluminum engine block (eg, a thermally sprayed steel coating). The motor bore wall 12 may have an initial diameter, for example a cast iron jacket diameter, or may be shaped during molding of an engine block, for example by means of mold cores. However, the initial diameter may be machined (e.g., "cubed") or otherwise shaped prior to the illustrated boring operation, for example, to remove the mold template. As previously described, the conventional boring operation comprises three independent boring steps: rough bore, semi-finished bore, and finished bore. During each step, a boring bar 14 to which one or more cutting inserts 16 are attached rotates relative to a longitudinal axis 18 of the boring bar to remove material from the motor bore wall 12. The cutting insert 16 has a fixed cutting radius with respect to the longitudinal axis 18 which is greater than the radius of the engine bore wall 12 prior to the reaming operation. The longitudinal axis 18 of the boring bar is also the longitudinal axis of the motor bore 10. As a result of the boring operation, the radius of the motor bore wall 12 becomes identical to the cutting radius of the cutting insert. Different boring bars 14 and / or cutting inserts 16 are used during the roughing, semi-finishing boring and finishing boring steps to increase the cutting radius during each step. Generally, the finishing boring bar includes a post-processing gauge and a regulating loop on a radial adjustment head of the boring bar to compensate for pad wear.
As a result, the bore of a motor bore is an inflexible operation. Each boring step corresponds to a tool with a fixed cutting radius, so that the tool must be changed at each boring step to increase the cutting radius. The bore of an engine bore requires a number of engine bore geometry boring tools (eg, three for the conventional three-step boring operation). If several engine bore geometries are used for a group of engines, then the number of bore tools can quickly increase. Boring tools can therefore represent significant capital expenditures, particularly when the number of different engine bore geometries increases. In addition, the need to store and maintain all the different bore tools can become resource intensive. In addition, the post-processing gauge and the adjustment head on the finishing boring bar are expensive and can duplicate the similar gauging used prior to the first break-in pass.
In addition to being inflexible and unprofitable, the boring operation is characterized by relatively long cycle times. As previously described, each boring step takes about 10 to 15 seconds. Therefore, to complete the three boring steps (roughing, semi-finishing and finishing), 30 to 45 seconds are required per engine bore. After the boring, a roughing-in operation is performed, followed by at least one additional semi-finishing or finishing operation. The roughing-in operation generally lasts about 40 seconds, so that the total roughing and roughing-in time for an engine bore is substantially greater than one minute (e.g., 30 seconds). bore + 40 seconds of roughing in = 70 seconds in total). Therefore, even though the conventional boring operation is capable of producing high quality engine bores, the operation is generally expensive and inflexible, with long cycle times.
Referring to FIG. 2, it has been discovered that high quality engine bores can also be produced by means of an interpolation milling operation. In interpolation milling, a milling tool 20 may be introduced into the motor bore 10 and used to remove material along a path around a perimeter of the motor bore 10. The motor bore 10 may be a motor boring liner, such as a cast iron liner, or may be a coated aluminum boring, such as with a thermally sprayed steel coating (eg, PTWA). The milling tool 20 may have a body 22 and a plurality of cutting inserts 24 coupled to the body 22, for example, directly or through a cartridge. The cutting inserts 24 may extend along a length of the body 22 and be spaced along the length. The length of the body may correspond to a longitudinal axis 26 of the body 22. There may be at least two rows 28 of cutting inserts 24 extending along the longitudinal axis 26, for example, two, three or four rows 28. The rows 28 may be arranged in a straight line or staggered so that the wafers are arranged at different locations around the perimeter of the body 22.
In at least one embodiment, the body 22 and the cutting inserts 24 may extend or cover an entire height of the motor bore 10. For example, the body 22 and the cutting inserts 24 may extend or cover at least 100 mm, for example at least 110 mm, 130 mm, 150 mm or 170 mm. The rows 28 of cutting inserts 24 may comprise two or more wafers, for example at least 5, 8 or 10 wafers or more. The total number of cutting inserts 24 may be the number of boards per row multiplied by the number of rows 28. Therefore, if there are four rows and ten boards per row, there will be 40 cutting inserts 24 in each row. total. As shown in FIG. 2, two or more rows 28 may be mutually shifted so that the pads 24 in one row remove the material that is not removed by another row because of the gaps 30 between the pads 24. In FIG. In one embodiment, the rows 28 may be configured in pairs, the pads 24 being shifted to remove the material in the spaces 30 left by the other row 28. There may be one or two groups of pairs or more, giving rise to to an even number of rows 28.
During the interpolating milling operation, the body 22 can rotate relative to its longitudinal axis 26. However, unlike the bore, the longitudinal axis 26 of the body does not correspond to or coincide with the longitudinal axis 32 of the Engine bore 10. The cutting radius of the milling tool 20 (e.g., from the tip of the cutting insert to the longitudinal axis of the body) is less than one radius of the motor bore Therefore, the body 22 of the cutting tool can be introduced into the motor bore 10 (e.g., in a "z" direction) so that the body 22 and the cutting inserts 24 extend or cover the entire height of the motor bore 10. The body 22 can be rotated relative to its longitudinal axis 26, and then moved around the perimeter of the motor bore wall 12 to remove material therefrom. In one embodiment, the body 22 can be held constant or substantially constant in the z direction during the interpolating milling operation (e.g., the body 22 is not moved up or down by relative to the motor bore 10). The body 22 can be moved in the plane xy to move along a predetermined path and increase the size of the motor bore 10. The body 22 can be moved in a circular path having a radius or diameter greater than the current diameter of the engine bore to increase the radius or diameter of the engine bore.
Interpolation milling can be distinguished from mechanical roughening by interpolation depending on the type of tool, the movement of the tool, the resulting surface structure and the application of the material. Interpolation roughness generally includes a turning tool adapted to move about a perimeter of a bore to selectively remove material to roughen the surface (eg, forming streaks). ). However, interpolating roughening does not remove a thickness (or quasi-uniform) of material to increase a diameter of a bore. In addition, interpolated roughness is used only on aluminum or magnesium motor blocks to prepare the surface for subsequent coating (eg, PTWA), and not to shape a controlled bore diameter in cast iron jacket or aluminum engine bore already coated.
At least two turns or passes can be made (eg, complete circles). In one embodiment, the first revolution can remove as much material as possible (eg, maximizing the diameter of the engine bore). The next rounds can remove less material than the first round, and can successively remove less material each turn. For example, the first revolution can increase the diameter of the motor bore 10 by a maximum of 3 mm, such as from 0.5 to 3 mm, from 1 to 3 mm, from 1 to 2.5 mm, from 1.5 to 3 mm or 2 to 3 mm. The second revolution can increase the motor bore 10 by a maximum of 1.5 mm, such as from 0.25 to 1.5 mm, from 0.25 to 1 mm, from 0.5 to 1.5 mm, from 0, 5 to 1.25 mm or 0.75 to 1.25 mm, or about 1 mm (e.g., ± 0.1 mm). Turns after the second turn can increase the diameter of the motor bore 10 by a maximum of 0.5 mm, for example 0.1 to 0.5 mm or 0.25 to 0.5 mm. These increases in diameters are mere examples, and in some cases the diameter may be more or less increased during different turns.
An interpolation milling cut or pass can be significantly faster than a boring step. As previously described, a boring step generally lasts 10 to 15 seconds. On the other hand, an interpolated milling cut of an engine bore may last 8 seconds or less, for example 7, 6 or 5 seconds or less. In one embodiment, an interpolate milling pass can take from 2 to 5 seconds, from 3 to 5 seconds, 4 seconds, or about 4 seconds (eg, ± 0.5 seconds). Therefore, if 2 or 3 turns are made by a motor bore milling operation, the total milling time may, for example, be less than 25 seconds, less than 20 seconds or less than 15 seconds. For milling operations with only two laps, the total milling time can be less than 10 seconds.
During the interpolated milling operation, the reaction forces on the tool due to the side wall of the motor bore may cause the tool to bend radially inwards (eg towards the center or the longitudinal axis of the engine bore). The deflection may be greater for relatively long milling tools, such as the 100 m or more described tools used to mill an entire height of the motor bore at one time. Therefore, interpolating milling towers can give rise to a slight cone in the motor bore side wall 12, with the diameter of the motor bore 10 generally decreasing from the top of the bore downwardly. A schematic example of a conical motor bore 40 is illustrated in FIG. 3. As illustrated, a first end 42, which corresponds to the top of the bore, has a larger diameter than a second end 44, which corresponds to the bottom of the bore. As shown in FIG. 3, the diameter of the bore wall 46 decreases continuously with a constant rate of decrease. However, it is only a simplified illustration. The diameter may increase locally in regions down the bore (eg, the diameter may not be able to decrease constantly) and / or the rate of decrease in diameter may not be constant (eg for example, it can be usually exponential). In one embodiment, the interpolating milling operation may produce a frusto-conical bore having a relatively large or large diameter at the first end 42 and a relatively small or narrow diameter at the second end 44. Interpolation milling can generate a new frustoconical bore, which may have wider and / or larger narrow diameters. As previously described, the one or more frustoconical bores may have local diameter variations along the longitudinal axis, and the term "frusto-conical bore" is not meant to represent the exact geometric shape here.
After the interpolation milling operation (eg, one or more turns), a break-in operation may be performed on the enlarged motor bore. The honing operation can be performed to give a more precise geometry and / or surface finish to the engine bore. Generally, the break-in procedure involves turning a lapping tool with at least two lapping stones around a longitudinal axis while oscillating the lapping tool in the z direction (eg, from top to bottom) in the engine bore. The lapping stones are generally made of abrasive grains bonded together by an adhesive. The abrasive grains may have a grain size, which may be referred to as a grain size number or a grain size (eg, in microns). A force is applied to the lapping stones in the radial direction to increase the diameter of the bore. The conventional boring operation of an engine bore generally comprises three lapping steps, similar to the boring steps: roughing in, roughing-in and finishing-in. These lapping steps can successively remove less material (eg, increase the diameter of the bore by removing smaller and smaller quantities). In addition, the boring operation generally produces a substantially cylindrical bore. For example, the resulting bore may have a cylindricity less than or equal to 25 μm, for example up to 20 μm. Therefore, conventional lapping operations do not occur in the case of a tapered or frustoconical motor bore, as previously described from interpolated milling. In particular, the first break-in operation (roughing-in) is the step most affected by the geometry of the rough bore.
Accordingly, the present invention describes a lapping operation that could reduce or eliminate a cone in a motor bore to produce a cylindrical or substantially cylindrical motor bore 50, as shown in FIG. 4. The modified lapping operation can be a modified roughing-in operation, since the roughing-in operation is the first step that takes place after milling the motor bore. Conventional roughing operations use an established grain size and a break-in force of about 180 μm and 100 kgf, respectively. It has been found that these conventional lapping parameters make it difficult to remove or reduce a cone in an engine bore. However, it has been found that by increasing the grain size and / or the break-in force, the roughing-in operation may be used to remove or reduce the cone in a motor bore.
In one embodiment, the grain size of the rough-in lapping stone can be increased by comparison with the conventional rough-in lapping stone (eg, about 180 μm). For example, the grain size can be increased to at least 200 μm, 210 μm, 220 μm, or 230 μm. These grain sizes may be of medium grain size. In another embodiment, which may or may not be combined with an increase in grain size, the break-in force during the roughing-in operation may be increased by comparison with the conventional roughing-in force ( eg, about 100 kgf). For example, the roughing-in force may be increased to at least 150 kgf, 200 kgf, 250 kgf, 300 kgf or 350 kgf. In one embodiment, the roughing-in force may be increased to a value of from 150 to 350 kgf, or to any value within a sub-range, for example to a value between 175 and 325. kgf, 200 and 325 kgf, 250 and 325 kgf or at approximately 300 kgf (eg, ± 10 kgf). Rather than using absolute values, the roughing-in force may be increased depending on the standard roughing-in force for a given break-in operation. For example, the roughing-in force may be increased by at least 1.5x, 2x, 2.5x, 3x or 3.5x in comparison with the conventional roughing-in force. Therefore, if the conventional force is equal to 75 kgf, an increase of 3x would result in a force of 225 kgf.
Rather than adjusting the roughing-in parameters, one or two micro-calibration steps can be performed before a semi-finishing step to eliminate or reduce the cone in the engine bore. In one embodiment, a micro-calibration step may be added between the final milling step and a semi-finishing step. Microfilming uses abrasive particles (eg, diamond) bonded to a fixed diameter (non-expandable) body to remove material. Unlike lapping, the tool is introduced once into the bore and removed, instead of being introduced and removed several times, with simultaneous expansion of the tool. The microcalibration can be performed in one or several passes depending on the removal of material required.
Referring to Fig. 5, a flow chart 60 of a conventional break-in operation is illustrated. As previously described, the conventional operation comprises three boring steps: rough bore 62, semi-finishing bore 64 and finishing bore 66. After boring, the engine bore is lapped, usually by means of a three-step operation similar to the bore, starting with a roughing-in step 68. The semi-finishing bore 64 and the finishing bore 66 generally last at least 10 seconds each, and the rough bore generally lasts longer, for example about 15 seconds. Therefore, the reaming operation generally lasts about 35 seconds or more. The conventional roughing step 68 takes about 40 seconds, which results in a total time of about 75 seconds or more for steps 62 to 68. The conventional three-step honing operation increases the diameter of the engine bore of about 90 μιη, generally in increments of 50 μm, 30 μm and 10 μm for the first (blank), the second and third break-in stages respectively.
Referring to Figure 6, a process diagram 70 is illustrated for the interpolation milling operation described above. The interpolation milling operation can eliminate the boring step of the operation of producing a motor bore. It may however include a rough milling step 72 and a combined milling / finishing milling step 74, which may be referred to as a second milling step 74. Each interpolating milling step may include one or more turns around it. a perimeter of the engine bore to increase the diameter of the engine bore by removing material. In one embodiment, the rough milling step 72 may include a single turn or pass around the perimeter of the motor bore. The rough milling step can increase the diameter of the motor bore by a few millimeters maximum, for example, from about 1 to 2 mm. In one embodiment, the second milling step 74 may include one or two turns or passes around the perimeter of the motor bore. Each pass during the second milling step 74 may remove less material and increase the diameter of the motor bore by less than that of the rough milling step 72. For example, each pass may increase the diameter of 1 mm maximum. In one embodiment, the milling steps 72 and 74 can be performed with the same tool or with different tools (eg, with the same cutting radius).
The milling steps 72 and 74 may be substantially shorter than the boring operations described above. In one embodiment, each milling cut can last less than 8 seconds, for example, 7 seconds, 6 seconds, 5 seconds or 4 seconds maximum. Therefore, a milling operation comprising a rough bore lathe and two semifinished / finished lathes can last less than 24 seconds, or as little as 12 seconds or less. A milling operation with a rough bore and a second milling cut can take less than 16 seconds, or as little as 8 seconds or less. Therefore, the total duration of the pre-break-in steps in process diagram 70 (eg, milling steps) can be significantly and significantly shorter than the total pre-break-in time on process diagram 60 ( eg, boring steps). As previously described, the three-step boring operation generally lasts for at least 35 seconds, which is almost three times longer than the duration of a milling operation in 3 turns (eg, 12 seconds, 4 seconds). tr) and more than four times longer than the duration of a milling operation in 2 turns (eg, 8 seconds, 4 s / rev).
After the milling steps 72 and 74, a modified roughing step 76 can be performed. As previously described, milling steps 72 and 74 can produce a tapered motor bore, which can be described as a frustoconical bore having a narrow diameter and a large diameter at the ends. As a result, the modified roughing step 76 can reduce or eliminate the cone in the bore, while providing a more accurate geometry and / or surface finish than conventional roughing-in. . The modified roughing step 76 may further remove material from the narrow end of the engine bore (eg, the bottom of the bore, as shown in FIGS. increase the diameter of the bore at the narrow end. As previously described, this additional material removal can be achieved by increasing the grit size of the lapping stones and / or by increasing the force / pressure applied by the lapping stones. The conventional roughing-in step generally increases the diameter of the motor bore by about 50 μm, then 30 μm and 10 μm in the second and third passes respectively, or about 90 μm in total. In the modified roughing step 76, the diameter of a narrow end of the engine bore may be increased by a value greater than the conventional value to reduce or eliminate the cone. In other words, the minimum diameter of the engine bore can be increased by a value greater than the conventional value to reduce or eliminate the cone. In at least one embodiment, the minimum diameter may be increased by at least 55 μm, for example at least 60 μm, 65 μm, 70 μm, 75 μm, 80 μm, 85 μm, 90 μm, 95 μm. or 100 pm.
After the modified roughing step 76, additional lapping steps can be performed. These lapping steps may be the same or similar to the second, third, or other conventional lapping steps. As previously described, the conventional multi-step lapping operation generally increases the diameter of the motor bore by about 90 μm. In one embodiment, the total diameter increase achieved through the modified roughing step 76 and additional lapping steps (eg, one or two additional steps) may be much greater. For example, the total diameter increase may be at least 120 μm, 125 μm, 130 μm, 135 μm, 140 μm, 145 μm or 150 μm. The total diameter increase may extend from a minimum or narrow end of a raw conical bore or from any other diameter of the raw bore, including the broad end or the maximum diameter. The modified roughing step 76 may last as long or nearly as long as the conventional roughing step 68 (e.g., about 40 seconds). In at least one embodiment, the total time of steps 72 to 76 (eg, milling and roughing in) may be less than or equal to 65 seconds. For example, the total duration may be less than or equal to 60, 55, or 50 seconds. Therefore, the method of producing engine bores by interpolating milling can last much shorter than the usual 75 second cycle time achieved by the conventional boring operation. In particular, the duration of pre-break operations (eg, boring or milling) can be reduced by more than half. For example, a milling operation with two milling lathes can last only 8 seconds, compared to the 35 seconds required to perform a three-step boring operation.
Referring to Fig. 7, the milling tool 80 (eg, a milling cutter with side cutting end) may have a plurality of cutting inserts 82 disposed along its length (e.g. its longitudinal axis), each having a cutting edge 84. In conventional milling tools, the cutting inserts 82 are designed such that each cutting edge 84 has the same cutting radius 86. The cutting radius 86 can be defined from a center or longitudinal axis 88 of the cutting tool 80 to the cutting edge 84. The tool 80 in Fig. 7 is illustrated with the conventional configuration of a radius of The identical spokes can thus generate a uniform distribution 90 of the forces on the motor bore wall 92. However, as described previously, during the interpolated milling operation, reaction forces on the tool due to the by oi lateral of the motor bore can be generated. As a result, a bending moment 94 is generated, causing the tool to bend radially inwards (e.g., towards the center or longitudinal axis of the motor bore). In addition, there may be local variations of the engine block in terms of structural stiffness, which may result in bending of the tool or uneven distortion of the parts which may result in dimensional errors in the engine bore. This can produce a cone 96 in the motor bore wall 92 during the interpolating milling operation. When milling is used for other applications, deep pockets are obtained by finishing machining in a series of finer layers, cut in succession until the full depth is reached. This approach greatly increases the machining cycle time and wear rate of the tools, but is required in many applications to meet the required tolerances.
However, it has been found that by adjusting the cutting radiuses of the individual cutting inserts, the cone can be reduced or eliminated. Referring to Figure 8, the milling tool 100 (eg, a milling cutter with side cut end) illustrated may have a plurality of cutting inserts 102 disposed along its length (e.g. at its longitudinal axis), each having a cutting edge 104. Unlike conventional milling tools, the cutting inserts 102 are designed so that each cutting edge 104 does not have the same cutting radius 106. cut 106 may be defined from a center or longitudinal axis 108 of the cutting tool 100 to the cutting edge 104. The tool 100 may allow a milling operation of the entire depth. a single step (eg, cutting the full height of the bore at one time) without the need for multiple successive cuts.
As illustrated, there may be a plurality of different cutting rays 106, so that there are at least 2, 3, 4, 5 or more different cutting rays 106. In one embodiment, each cutting insert 102 can be independently adjustable from a first radius to a second radius or from a minimum radius to a maximum radius. The pads 102 may be mechanically adjustable so that the adjustment is made by the tool (e.g., not directly by hand). However, the tool 100 may also include cutting inserts 102 that are not adjustable, or multiple cutting inserts 102 that can be bonded so that their cutting radii are adjusted together. Any combination of independently adjustable, fixed and bonded cutting inserts may be included in the cutting tool 100. As shown in FIG. 8, the variable cutting radii may generate a non-uniform distribution of forces on the bore wall 110 of motor 112.
The cutting rays 106 may be configured to reduce or eliminate the cone in the motor bore wall 112. For example, the cutting rays may be configured to compensate for the bending of the tool 100 caused by bending moment 114 caused by reaction forces due to the motor bore wall 112 (previously described phenomenon). In one embodiment, the cutting radius 106 of one or more cutting inserts 102 may be determined on the basis of an initial milling operation by interpolation with all cutting radii at the same or substantially the same distance. . After the milling operation, the motor bore can be measured to determine the dimensional change at several axial positions in the bore. The dimensional variation can be an average variation at each position. The multiple axial positions may correspond to the positions of the cutting inserts, for example at the center points of the inserts. Dimensional variations can be expressed by "+" or "-" in relation to the programmed or configured radius. For example, a radius too large of 20 μm may be denoted "+20", and a radius too small of 20 μm may be denoted "-20", or vice versa (the sign may represent any direction, provided that always use the same). Once the engine bore is measured and analyzed, the cutting rays 106 can be set to the same value, but with a sign opposite to the measured dimensions. Therefore, if the radius of a certain cutting position is +20, the cutting radius can be set to -20 (eg, if the radius is too large by 20 μm, the platen can be adjusted radially 20 pm inwards). Some or all of the cutting inserts can be adjusted using this method. Once a certain milling operation has been measured and analyzed, the set spokes can be used in subsequent milling operations without recalibration. Otherwise, the settings can be recalibrated after a number of milling operations.
Although the foregoing operation can provide a precise method of adjusting the cutting radiuses 106, any suitable method can be used to adjust the cutting rays 106 to reduce or eliminate a cone in a motor bore. For example, cut radius settings can be calculated or predicted by modeling. In one embodiment, the cutting radius settings can be calculated using finite element analysis (FEA) or a finite element method (FEM). Finite element analysis, as a general operation, is known in the art and will not be explained in detail. It usually consists of analyzing or approximating a real object by splitting it into a large number of "finite elements", such as small cubes. Mathematical equations can then be used to predict the behavior of each element based on inputs to the properties of the material. A computer or computer software can then add or add all the behaviors of the individual elements to predict the behavior of the approximated object. For example, in the interpolation milling operation, properties of the milling tool (eg, number, size, material properties, configuration / layout, etc., cutting inserts), milling operation (eg cutting radius, applied force, etc.) and motor bore (eg material properties, bore configuration, etc.) can be entered into a specially designed software programmed, which can then calculate +/- values expected or approximated, as the method described above.
In another embodiment, the adjustments can be made on the basis of equations or simplified mathematical assumptions. For example, bending moment on the tool generally causes inward bending of the distal end of the milling tool to a maximum amplitude, or at least greater than that of the proximal end of the milling tool. tool. Therefore, it can be assumed that the bending of the tool inward generally increases as the position along the length of the tool increases. The settings can therefore be based on increasing sag using a mathematical formula. For example, the formula can be a linear increase with the length, or an exponential increase, for example a hyperbolic increase. The cutting radius settings can therefore follow a formula predicting the general behavior of the tool during milling.
In at least one embodiment, the cutting rays 106 of the platelets may have a certain range of motion. The range of motion can be defined as a difference between the first cutting radius (eg, maximum) and the second cutting radius (eg, minimum). In one embodiment, the difference between the first and second cutting rays may be at least 5 μm, for example at least 10 μm, 15 μm, 20 μm, 25 μm or 30 μm. In another embodiment, the difference between the first and second cutting rays can be at most 50 μm, for example at most 45 μm or 40 μm. For example, the difference may be from 5 pm to 35 pm, or any value within a subinterval, for example from 5 to 25 pm, from 10 to 30 pm, from 10 to 25 pm, at 30 pm, 15 to 25 pm or in any other subinterval. Each cutting insert may have the same range of motion, or one or more pads may have different ranges of motion. For example, pads near the bottom of the tool may have a greater range of motion to compensate for the bending of the tool inwardly.
Referring to Figures 9 and 10, an embodiment of a milling tool 120 is illustrated, the tool including adjustable cutting inserts 122. The inserts 122 may be of any suitable type of cutting insert, for example, tungsten carbide, cubic boron nitride, diamond or others. The milling tool 120 illustrated is a milling cutter with side cutting end. However, the adjustable cutting inserts 122 described may be applied to other peripheral milling tools or used in other peripheral milling tools. The tool 120 comprises a tool body 124, to which the cutting inserts 122 are coupled. The cutting inserts 122 may be attached directly to the body 124 or may be attached indirectly, for example by means of a cartridge attached to the 124. As previously described, there may be at least two rows 126 of cutting inserts 122 extending along the longitudinal axis 128 of the tool, for example, two, three or four rows 126. be arranged in a straight line or staggered so that the pads are disposed at different locations around the perimeter of the body 124 (eg, as shown in Figure 9). In one embodiment, the rows 126 may be configured in pairs, and the pads 122 of each pair may be designed so that the pads at the same position in the rows 126 may have the same cutting radiuses 106. For example, the 5th wafer from the top of each row may have a "-15" position, and the 6th wafer from the top of each row may have a "+10" position.
In at least one embodiment, the body 124 and the cutting inserts 122 may be designed to extend or cover an entire height of a motor bore. For example, the body 124 and the cutting inserts 122 may extend or cover at least 100 mm, for example at least 110 mm, 120 mm, 145 mm or 160 mm. The rows 126 of cutting inserts 122 may each comprise two or more platelets, for example at least 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 platelets or more. The total number of cutting inserts 122 may be the number of boards per row multiplied by the number of rows 126. Therefore, if there are four rows and ten boards per row, there will be 40 cutting inserts 122 in each row. total. As shown in Fig. 9, two or more rows 126 may be mutually shifted so that the wafers 122 in one row remove the material that is not removed by another row because of the gaps 130 between the wafers 122. In In one embodiment, the rows 126 may be configured in pairs, the wafers 122 being shifted to remove the material in the spaces 130 left by the other row 126. There may be one or two groups of pairs or more, giving rise to To an even number of rows 126. For example, the tool illustrated in FIG. 9 comprises four rows 126, each comprising ten cutting inserts 122. The rows are configured in two pairs, the pads of each pair being located on sides opposite of the tool body 124 (e.g., 180 ° around the perimeter).
Referring to Fig. 10, a close-up view of the cutting inserts 122 of the tool 120 is illustrated. The cutting inserts each have a cutting edge 132 which can form the reference point for measuring the cutting radius of the wafer. Each wafer 122 may be attached to the body 124. In the embodiment illustrated in Figures 9 and 10, the wafers 122 are each attached to the body 124 by a fastener 134, such as a screw. The fastener may extend through an opening or hole 136 in the wafer 122 and in a threaded portion (not shown) of a fastening surface 138 on the body 124. The opening 136 may be a hole with a diameter greater than the diameter of the fastener 134, so as to allow the radial displacement inwardly and outwardly of the wafer 122 before the final fixing of the fastener 134. The wafer may have a rim 140 surrounding the opening 136 and adapted to be in contact with the head 142 of the fastener and secure the wafer 122 in place.
An adjustment mechanism 144 may be positioned adjacent to any or all of the cutting inserts 122 to adjust the cutting radius of the cutting edge 132. In one embodiment, the adjustment mechanism 144 may comprise an adjusting screw 146 and an adjusting member 148. The adjusting screw 146 may be tapered so as to have a larger diameter at its upper part and a smaller diameter at its lower part. The adjusting screw 146 may be received by a threaded portion in the body 124. The adjusting member 148 may be disposed near the cutting insert 122 and adapted to be in contact with the adjusting screw 146. The element The adjusting member 148 may be formed as a wall in proximity to the cutting insert 122 and engageable with one side of the cutting insert 122.
In operation, the cutting radius of the cutting insert 122 can be adjusted by moving the adjusting member 148 (eg, a wall) through a rotation of the adjusting screw 146. Prior to attachment of the cutting insert 122 to the attachment surface 138 through the fastener 134, the adjusting screw 146 may be rotated so as to further screw it into the threaded portion of the body 124 or way to disengage or unscrew from the threaded part. When the adjusting screw 146 is deeply screwed, the conical diameter of the screw contacts the adjusting member 148 and pushes it to cause its outward radial deflection to increase the cutting radius of the wafer. When the adjusting screw 146 is unscrewed or disengaged, the conical diameter of the screw ceases to apply a force to the adjusting member 148 or applies less force, and the adjusting member 148 may partially or fully reverse its position not flexed and reduce the cutting radius. Therefore, by adjusting the adjusting screw 146, the cutting insert 122 can be translational to the attachment surface 138 to increase or decrease by adjustment the cutting radius of the cutting plate 122. The adjustment can be controllable and repeatable. For example, the cutting radius can be incrementally controlled on the basis of the number of revolutions of the adjusting screw 146 (e.g., inwardly or outwardly).
Although Figs. 9 and 10 illustrate an exemplary adjustment mechanism, any adjustment mechanism suitable for controllable and reliable modification of the cutting radius of a cutting insert may be used. For example, rather than translating along the attachment surface 138, the cutting inserts may rotate relative to an axis parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tool to increase or decrease the radius of the tool. chopped off. In addition, although the cutting inserts 122 are illustrated as being directly attached to the body 124, they can also be coupled indirectly to the body 124, for example by means of a cartridge. The pads may be attached to a cartridge in a manner similar to that previously described (eg, with an adjustable cutting radius with respect to the cartridge), and then the cartridge may be attached to the body 124.
Accordingly, the present invention relates to a milling tool having adjustable cutting inserts, wherein the cutting radius of one or more of the cutting inserts can be varied or adjusted. The tool can be used to reduce or eliminate a cone in a motor bore during an interpolating milling operation. As previously described, a bending moment on the tool may cause the tool to bend inward and cause uneven material removal along a longitudinal axis of the tool. The wafers can therefore be adjusted, for example, on the basis of an empirical test or modeling to compensate for dimensional errors generated with a single constant cutting radius for an entire tool.
It has also been surprisingly discovered that dimensional errors may not result in a constant decrease in bore diameter (eg, continuous cone). On the contrary, there may be local areas where the milling diameter is larger than in an area further up the bore. Accordingly, a milling tool for correcting dimensional errors may include at least three cutting inserts in succession from an upper first end of the tool body to a second lower end of the tool body, the radius cutting the second wafer being greater than the cutting radius of the first and third wafers. This makes it possible to correct dimensional errors where there is a local region having a larger diameter than a region located above in the engine bore. The cutting radius of the first wafer may be larger than the cutting radius of the third wafer. There may, of course, be more than three cutting inserts coupled to the tool, and the following three platelets described may be anywhere in the following platelets from top to bottom of the tool.
However, there may be a general tendency to decrease the bore diameter from top to bottom of the bore (e.g., in the insertion direction of the tool). As a result, the cutting radius of the tool can be adjusted so that it generally increases from top to bottom. In one embodiment, the cutting inserts in the upper half of the tool can be adjusted to have an average cutting radius less than an average cutting radius of the cutting inserts in the lower half of the tool. For example, if there are ten cutting inserts spaced along the longitudinal axis, an average cutting radius of the five upper platelets may be less than an average of the five lower platelets. In another embodiment, an average cutting radius of the third upper wafer of the wafers may be adjusted to be less than an average cutting radius of the third wafer of the wafers. The third center wafer of the wafers can be adjusted to have a mean cutting radius between that of the third upper wafer and the third lower wafer. For example, if there are nine cutting inserts spaced along the longitudinal axis, an average cutting radius of the three upper platelets may be less than an average of the three lower platelets. In one example, an average cutting radius of the three central platelets may be less than an average of the three lower platelets, but greater than an average of the three upper platelets. If the number of cutting inserts is not a multiple of two or three, the upper or lower half or the upper or lower third may be defined by rounding down or up. For example, if there are ten platelets, the upper and lower thirds may include three platelets each.
Referring to Figs. 11 and 12, experimental data showing improved dimensional control of engine bore diameters by means of adjustable cutting inserts are illustrated. Referring to Figure 11, four initial bores were milled using a tool having a constant cutting radius. The diameter of the bores 1 to 3 as a function of the boring depth from the deck face is illustrated in FIG. 11. The bore 4 has been cut by means of a milling tool comprising wafers adjusted according to the previously described method by means of equal offsets with opposite signs. In order to measure the difference, the interpolated milling diameter was increased during the cutting of the bore 4. As shown in FIG. 11, the bores 1 to 3 show a general decrease in the bore diameter as the boring depth increases (with the exception of some local increases, as previously described). Bores 1 to 3 have a difference of about 60 μm in diameter from top to bottom, a significant cone. In contrast, the bore 4 remained in a window of 40 μm and showed no general tendency to shrink from top to bottom.
Fig. 12 shows bore diameter data for 8 bores of a milled V8 motor by means of a milling tool comprising wafers adjusted according to the method described above by means of equal offsets with opposite signs. As illustrated, the 8 bore diameters are all controlled to be within a 20 μm window from top to bottom. In general, the conventional three-step boring operation previously described also generally controls the diameter in a 20 μm window. Therefore, the adjustable milling tool described may allow the interpolating milling operation to achieve, almost or completely, a similar or better level of control over the engine bore diameter, while providing the other improvements. previously described (eg, shorter cycle times, reduced tooling investment, increased flexibility). For example, the described methods and tools can control the bore diameter in a window of 25 μm or less, for example up to 20 μm, up to 15 μm or up to 10 μm.
In addition to the cone, another potential challenge in using milling (eg, interpolating milling) to produce engine bores may be the resulting surface roughness of the bore wall. The honing operation that follows the milling operation can be more efficient with a relatively rough surface. The conventional three-step boring operation to produce the engine bore gives rise to a relatively rough surface for effective subsequent break-in. However, milling generally results in a smoother surface than the bore, due to the alignment of the pads and the relatively long and smooth cutting edges of each wafer. The milling inserts generally include a cutting body mounted with removable inserts of a tool material, such as tungsten carbide, cubic boron nitride or diamond. The tools are normally mounted with a face parallel to the tool axis. Compared with the bore and similar internal machining operations, milling produces a relatively smooth surface finish with an average roughness of the order of 1 micron Ra in general. It has been found that this low roughness can make side cut milling difficult or unsuitable for certain applications, which require minimal roughness for subsequent operations, such as lapping. Lapping usually requires minimal roughness, so abrasive stones cut without applying excessive stone pressure and / or so that lapping stones can "bite" the material.
With reference to FIG. 13, a cutting insert 150 that can be used in the milling operations described is illustrated. The cutting insert 150 may have a cutting edge 152. Unlike the cutting edges of conventional milling tools, which are smooth and flat, the cutting edge 152 may be relatively rough or textured. For example, a conventional milling cutting edge has an average roughness (Rz) of less than 6 μm. The average roughness can be calculated by measuring the vertical distance from the maximum projection to the maximum trough, with a number of sampling lengths, for example five sampling lengths. The value Rz is then determined by calculating the average of these distances. The average roughness is calculated from a number (eg, five) of the maximum peaks and maximum valleys, so that the extreme values may have a greater influence on the Rz value (e.g. in comparison with the arithmetic average roughness, Ra). The roughness Rz can be defined according to the ASME B46-1 standard. The cutting edge 152 of a cutting insert 150 may have a greater roughness (e.g., average roughness) than the cutting edges of conventional milling inserts. In one embodiment, the cutting edge 152 may have a mean roughness (Rz) of at least 5 μm, for example at least 7.5 μm, 10 μm, 12 μm or 15 μm. In another embodiment, the cutting edge 152 may have an average roughness (Rz) of 7 to 30 μm, or any value within a sub-range, for example 7 to 25 μm, at 25 μm, 12 to 25 μm, 10 to 20 μm or 12 to 20 μm.
The surface roughness of the cutting edge 152 may generate a corresponding corresponding surface roughness in the object being milled (eg, a motor bore). Therefore, a cutting insert 150 having a cutting edge 152 with a mean roughness (Rz) of 12 to 20 μm can generate a motor bore wall having a mean roughness (Rz) of 12 to 20 μm. In one embodiment, the cutting insert 150 with the relatively rough cutting edge 152 may be used during the interpolation milling operations described above to produce a relatively rough milled motor bore prior to lapping. The relatively rough cutting edge 152 may be used only in a pass or a final milling run to generate the rougher surface for lapping. However, the cutting edge 152 may also be used for any or all of the passes past the final pass. The textured cutting edge 152 is illustrated in Fig. 13 and has a generally sinusoidal shape or shape. However, any suitable profile for obtaining the described surface roughness can be used. With reference to Figs. 14A-14D, several examples of shapes and profiles of a textured cutting edge are illustrated. Fig. 14A illustrates a sinusoidal profile 160, Fig. 14B illustrates a square wave profile 162, Fig. 14C illustrates a triangular wave profile 164, and Fig. 14D illustrates a sawtooth wave profile 166. cutting edge of a cutting insert can be generated with one or more of these profiles, and different cutting inserts can have cutting edges with different profiles. Although profiles 160 to 166 are illustrated in idealized schematic form, the profile shapes may be less precise and more general.
In one embodiment, the profile of cutting edges designed to contact the same region (e.g., at a certain height or height range in a motor bore) may have projections and staggered or offset hollows. The projections may designate a protuberance above the average surface roughness, and the depressions may denote a depression below the average surface roughness. Therefore, by staggering the projections and troughs of the cutting edge profiles, less extreme surface variations can be formed on the resulting surface. For example, if the cutting inserts are arranged in rows having the same number of boards per row, at least two boards at the same height or position in the row (eg, 3rd row from the top) may have projections and depressions offset or staggered.
Cutting inserts having relatively rough cutting edges can be produced by any suitable method. The cutting edges can be initially produced with increased surface roughness or surface profile, or the increased roughness or profile can be produced at a later stage. If it is produced at a later stage, the increased roughness can be generated by any appropriate operation. In one embodiment, the increased roughness can be generated by spark erosion machining (EDM), which can also be referred to as spark erosion or other names. EDM generally involves a series of very regular current discharges between a tool electrode and a workpiece electrode, separated by a dielectric liquid and subjected to a voltage. When the electrodes are close together, the electric field between the electrodes exceeds the resistance of the dielectric, it breaks and allows the current to flow. Material is then removed from both electrodes. To generate a certain profile or geometry, the EDM tool can be guided along a desired path, very close to the workpiece (eg, the cutting edge). Other "non-mechanical" methods can also be used to generate surface roughness and / or profiles, such as electrochemical machining (ECM), water jet cutting or laser cutting. However, mechanical methods can also be used, such as grinding with an abrasive wheel or polishing with an abrasive brush. The cutting edge may be sanded or polished to a grain size corresponding to the desired roughness of the cutting edge, for example at least 5 μm, 7.5 μm, 10 μm, 12 μm or 15 μm. In one embodiment, the cutting edge can be polished / sanded on the sidewall with a diamond grinding wheel having a grain size of at least 5 μm, 7.5 μm, 10 μm, 12 μm or 15 μm.
In addition to or instead of roughening or texturing the cutting edges of the cutting inserts to generate a rougher motor bore wall, the insert may be bent or tilted to achieve the same or similar result (e.g. ., a higher roughness). Referring to Fig. 15, an inclined milling cutting insert 170 is shown coupled to a cutting body 172. The inclined plate 170 may have a cutting edge 174 with an oblique orientation with respect to a longitudinal axis 176 of the housing body. section 172 (eg, neither parallel nor perpendicular). One or more cutting inserts coupled to the cutting body 172 may be inclined, for example all cutting inserts. Therefore, when the cutting body rotates relative to the longitudinal axis 176, the cutting edges 174 can remove various amounts of material along a height of the cutting edges, giving rise to a greater surface roughness.
In one embodiment, the angle or inclination of the cutting edge 174 may be referred to as the step height 178, defined as the difference, in a cutting radius, from one end of the cutting edge to the cutting edge. other (eg, as shown in Figure 15). The pitch height can be configured to form a mean surface roughness (Rz), as previously described for textured platelets (eg, at least 5 μm, 10 μm, etc.). In one embodiment, the pitch height may be at least 5 μm, 7.5 μm, 10 μm, 15 μm, 20 μm, 25 μm or 30 μm. For example, the pitch height may be from 5 to 30 μm, or any value within a sub-range, for example from 7 to 25 μm, 7 to 20 μm, 7 to 15 μm, at 20 pm or from 12 to 20 pm. Although the inclined plate 170 is illustrated with an upper cutting radius longer than a lower cutting radius, the configuration can also be reversed. In one embodiment, each cutting insert (or each cutting insert with pitch height) may have the same step height. However, in some embodiments, platelets may have a plurality of different pitch heights.
In another embodiment, the inclination or angle of the cutting edge 174 can be expressed as an offset angle 180, defined as an offset angle with respect to the longitudinal axis 176. the cutting body (eg, from the vertical). As shown in Figure 15, the offset angle may be exaggerated to facilitate viewing. As with the pitch height, the offset angle 180 may be configured to form a mean surface roughness (Rz), as previously described for textured platelets (e.g., at least 5 μm, 10 μm, etc.) . In one embodiment, the offset angle 180 may be 0.01 to 0.5 degrees, or any value within a subinterval. For example, the offset angle 180 may be 0.01 to 0.3 degrees, 0.01 to 0.2 degrees, 0.03 to 0.2 degrees, or 0.05 to 0.1 degrees. . In one embodiment, each cutting insert (or each cutting insert with an offset) may have the same offset angle. However, in some embodiments, platelets may have a plurality of different offset angles.
Any suitable mechanism may be used to shift or create the pitch height in the cutting edge 174. In the embodiment illustrated in Fig. 15, the illustrated mechanism is similar to that illustrated and described with reference to Figs. 9 and 10. However, the mechanism of Figure 15 may have two adjusting screws 182 instead of one. The adjusting screws 182 may be spaced apart and may both be conical so as to have a larger diameter at their upper portion and a smaller diameter at their lower portion. The adjusting screws 182 may be received by a threaded portion in the body 172 and be adjacent to an adjusting member 184. The adjusting member 184 may be disposed near the cutting insert 170 and adapted to be in contact with the the adjusting screw 182. The adjusting member 184 may be formed as a wall in proximity to the cutting insert 170 and engageable with one side of the cutting insert 170.
Like the single screw configuration described above, the offset of the cutting insert 170 can be mechanically adjusted by the movement of the adjusting member 184 (eg, a wall) through a rotation of the adjusting screw 182. Prior to attachment of the cutting insert 170 to a fixing surface of the cutting body 172 by means of a fastening element, the adjusting screws 182 can be turned so as to screw them more in a threaded portion of the body 172 or so as to disengage or unscrew the threaded portion. When each adjusting screw 182 is deeply screwed, the conical diameter of the screw contacts the adjusting member 184 and pushes it to cause its radial outward deflection. When the adjusting screw 182 is unscrewed or disengaged, the conical diameter of the screw ceases to apply force to the adjusting member 184 or applies less force, and the adjusting member 184 may loosen and partially return or totally in its unflipped position.
Therefore, by adjusting each of the adjusting screws 182 at different depths or to bend the adjusting member 184 at different magnitudes along its length, the cutting insert 170 can be translated to the attachment surface in order to adjust an angle or offset of the cutting insert 170. The setting can be controllable and repeatable. For example, the angle or offset can be incrementally controlled based on the number of turns of each set screw 182 (e.g., inward or outward). Although FIG. 15 illustrates an example of an inclination or offset adjustment mechanism, any adjustment mechanism suitable for a controllable and reliable modification of the angle or offset of a cutting insert may be used.
The milling methods described for shaping engine bores can reduce cycle times (eg, compared to boring), increase flexibility, reduce tooling costs, and reduce tooling and tooling equipment. machining, among other benefits. Engine bores can be countersunk in a fraction of the time usually required for a bore, for example in less than 15 seconds for a milling operation in three passes or in less than 10 seconds for a two-pass milling operation. This reduces cycle times and provides better performance with less equipment or similar performance with less equipment. The same milling tool can be used for every one milling cutter and for several different bore geometries. The milling operation is therefore much more flexible than the bore, which requires a separate tool for each precise bore diameter. This greater flexibility can significantly reduce tooling costs when producing multiple engine block designs by significantly reducing the number of tools required. This greater flexibility and the reduction in the number of tools makes it possible to produce the same number of engine block configurations with fewer machining centers. The combination of milling and a modified roughing-in operation can also eliminate the closed-loop post-processing gauging and the diameter adjustment head required for finishing boring. In addition, the milling can be done dry, while the bore requires the application of a high volume of temperature-controlled coolant.
The adjustable insert milling tools described and / or the inclined or inclined cutting inserts may be used in the milling operations described, although they are not mandatory. Adjustable pads can reduce or eliminate the cone that may appear during the milling operation. This can facilitate the roughing-in step in the milling operation by reducing the lapping force and / or the stone grain size necessary to remove the cone and produce a cylindrical bore. The inclined cutting inserts may also facilitate the roughing-in step by increasing the surface roughness of the motor bore during the final milling pass. This also reduces the break-in force during roughing-in. The milling operations and tools described in the present invention can be used to shape a motor bore. Nevertheless, they can also be used to shape any generally cylindrical opening for any application.
Of course, the invention is not limited to the embodiments described and shown in the accompanying drawings. Modifications are possible, particularly from the point of view of the constitution of the various elements or by substitution of technical equivalents, without departing from the scope of protection of the invention.

权利要求:
Claims (10)
[1" id="c-fr-0001]
A milling tool (20; 80; 100; 120) characterized by comprising: an elongate body (22; 124) having a longitudinal axis (26; 88; 108; 128); and a plurality of cutting inserts (24; 82; 102; 122) coupled to the body (22; 124) and spaced along the longitudinal axis (26; 88; 108; 128), each cutting insert (24; 82; 102; 122) having a cutting edge (24; 84; 104; 132); the cutting edges (24; 84; 104; 132) having an oblique orientation with respect to the longitudinal axis of the elongated body (22; 124).
[2" id="c-fr-0002]
2. Tool according to claim 1, characterized in that each cutting edge (24; 84; 104; 132) has a first end and a second end and the first end has a cutting radius greater than that of the second end.
[3" id="c-fr-0003]
3. Tool according to claim 2, characterized in that the first end is an upper end of the cutting edge (24; 84; 104; 132), and the second end is a lower end of the cutting edge.
[4" id="c-fr-0004]
4. Tool according to claim 2, characterized in that the first end is a lower end of the cutting edge (24; 84; 104; 132), and the second end is an upper end of the cutting edge.
[5" id="c-fr-0005]
5. Tool according to claim 2, characterized in that the cutting radius of the first end is greater than at least 5 pm that of the second end.
[6" id="c-fr-0006]
6. Tool according to claim 2, characterized in that the cutting radius of the first end is greater than at least 10 pm that of the second end.
[7" id="c-fr-0007]
7. Tool according to claim 2, characterized in that the orientation of the cutting edges (24; 84; 104; 132) is adjustable.
[8" id="c-fr-0008]
A milling tool (20; 80; 100; 120) characterized by comprising: an elongated body (22; 124) having a longitudinal axis (26; 88; 108; 128); and a plurality of cutting inserts (24; 82; 102; 122) coupled to the body (22; 124) and spaced apart along the longitudinal axis (26; 88; 108; 128), each cutting insert (24; 82; 102; 122) having a cutting edge (24; 84; 104; 132); the cutting edges (24; 84; 104; 132) being offset from the longitudinal axis (26; 88; 108; 128) of the elongated body (22; 124) by an offset angle of 0.01 to 0.5 degree.
[9" id="c-fr-0009]
Tool according to claim 8, characterized in that the cutting edges (24; 84; 104; 132) are offset with respect to the longitudinal axis (26; 88; 108; 128) of the elongated body (22; ) an offset angle of 0.03 to 0.2 degrees.
[10" id="c-fr-0010]
Tool according to claim 8, characterized in that the cutting edges (24; 84; 104; 132) are offset with respect to the longitudinal axis (26; 88; 108; 128) of the elongate body (22; ) so that each cutting edge (24; 84; 104; 132) has a first end and a second end and the first end has a greater cutting radius than the second end.

类似技术:

---

公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题

---

FR3042994A1|2017-05-05|METHOD FOR MILLING A MOTOR BORING

---

FR3042995A1|2017-05-05|MILLING TOOL WITH PLATELET COMPENSATION

---

FR3042996A1|2017-05-05|MILLING TOOL WITH INCREASED ROUGHNESS

---

EP1175280B1|2007-08-01|Method for making an ophthalmic lens surface and installation therefor

---

RU2519335C2|2014-06-10|Method and tool for surface forming to preset roughness

---

JP4323357B2|2009-09-02|Pulley manufacturing method

---

KR101445546B1|2014-09-29|Full profile dressing roll for dressing multi-start cylindrical grinding worms

---

KR101479829B1|2015-01-06|Formed cutter manufacturing method and formed cutter grinding tool

---

JP2009056588A|2009-03-19|Tool and method for polishing discontinuous profile

---

CA2890452A1|2014-05-15|Method and device for manufacturing turbine blades

---

JP5846742B2|2016-01-20|Method for producing a honeycomb extrusion die from a die body

---

Guo et al.2018|Surface quality characterisation of diamond cut V-groove structures made of rapidly solidified aluminium RSA-905

---

BR102016025212A2|2017-05-02|milling insert elements

---

FR2894497A3|2007-06-15|Milling procedure and tool for flat surface machining, e.g. for engine crankcase, uses blank machining stage made up of sub-stages with successive axial increments

---

Tawakoli et al.2013|New kinematic in dressing of grinding wheels

---

FR2505709A1|1982-11-19|Method of forming regular micro-relief on shaft - uses intermittent shaft rotation and axial shift with grinding wheel oscillating radially

---

FR2982785A1|2013-05-24|METHOD FOR OBTAINING AN OPHTHALMIC LENS

---

FR2973722A1|2012-10-12|Method for honing inner surface of cylinder casing barrel of heat engine of car, involves inserting electrode inside barrel, where surface of barrel is subjected to rough honing before being honed by sinker electric discharge machining

---

Riebel2019|Investigation into the effect of groove geometry on grinding performance in creep-feed grinding

---

FR2616695A1|1988-12-23|METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A CUTTING TOOL BY ELECTRO-EROSION, ELECTRODE AND CORRESPONDING TOOL

---

WO2019175495A1|2019-09-19|Method for machining a variable pitch toothing on a steering rack

---

FR2861002A1|2005-04-22|IC engine crankcase machining procedure uses single milling tool with two sets of cutting edges for coarse and fine surface milling

---

FR2597773A3|1987-10-30|Grinding wheel

---

FR2971172A1|2012-08-10|Method for honing barrel surface of cylinder casing of e.g. heat engine of motor vehicle, after applying iron coating on surface, involves forging part of surface by radial contraction and expansion of mandrel based on angular position

同族专利:

---

公开号 | 公开日

---

GB201618213D0|2016-12-14|

---

MX2016014284A|2017-06-19|

---

CN106825712A|2017-06-13|

---

CA2944131A1|2017-04-30|

---

DE102016120492A1|2017-05-04|

---

GB2544643A|2017-05-24|

---

US20170120350A1|2017-05-04|

引用文献:

---

公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题

---

---

GB304117A|1928-01-14|1929-08-01|O K Tool Co Inc|Improvements in or relating to inserted blade cutters for milling-machines, lathes and other metal-cutting machines|

---

US2645003A|1950-02-09|1953-07-14|Standard Railway Equipment Mfg|Cutting tool|

---

US3079671A|1958-10-30|1963-03-05|O K Tool Co Inc|Adjustable bit holding means|

---

US3785746A|1972-01-17|1974-01-15|Kysor Industrial Corp|Adjustable tool holder|

---

US3798724A|1972-07-28|1974-03-26|Gorham Tool Co|Locking arrangement for cutting blade inserts|

---

US3946474A|1974-06-03|1976-03-30|Conestoga Wood Products, Inc.|Rotary cutting head|

---

DE3042051A1|1980-11-07|1982-07-08|Müller & Christner GmbH & Co KG, 7430 Metzingen|Milling head releasable cutting bit carrier - axially adjustable by inclined set screw with conical tip engaging wall of bore in head|

---

DE3211136C2|1982-03-26|1984-01-12|Fried. Krupp Gmbh, 4300 Essen|Shell end mill|

---

US4844666A|1986-08-22|1989-07-04|Izumo Industrial Co., Ltd.|Insert rotary cutting tool|

---

US4790693A|1987-02-06|1988-12-13|Ingersoll Cutting Tool Company|Interfitting on-edge inserts for milling cutters|

---

CN87205072U|1987-06-15|1988-04-13|四川工具厂|Cutter of turnable-round and hard alloy for maize milling|

---

DE3918034C2|1989-06-02|2000-11-02|Mapal Fab Praezision|Cutting tool for machining inner and outer contours on a workpiece|

---

US5217330A|1992-04-22|1993-06-08|Dennstedt Jack W|Adjustable cutting tool insert assembly|

---

DE4243586A1|1992-12-22|1994-06-23|Beck August Gmbh Co|Machine reamer|

---

EP0776258B1|1994-03-29|2001-10-31|NILES-SIMMONS Industrieanlagen GmbH|Rail-wheel machining tool and method of machining sets of rail wheels|

---

US6056484A|1998-08-07|2000-05-02|Kennametal Inc.|Device and method for adjusting the position of cutting inserts mounted in a cutting tool|

---

US6155753A|1999-07-15|2000-12-05|Chang; Hsin-Tien|Fine adjusting mechanism for a cutting tool|

---

JP2001328018A|2000-05-23|2001-11-27|Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd|Window hole forming cutting tool and window hole forming cutting method|

---

SE516612C2|2000-06-27|2002-02-05|Sandvik Ab|Adjusting mechanism for a cutter as well as tools for chip separating machining|

---

US7114890B2|2001-02-13|2006-10-03|Valenite Inc.|Cutting tool adjustment device|

---

US6739807B2|2001-11-26|2004-05-25|Valenite Llc|Rotatable cutting tool|

---

US6773209B2|2002-05-31|2004-08-10|Kennametal Inc.|Helical insert and cutter bodies|

---

US6811359B2|2002-05-31|2004-11-02|Kennametal Inc.|True helical cutter system|

---

US6942432B2|2003-03-28|2005-09-13|Sandvik Intellectual Property Ab|Milling cutter and insert-carrying cartridge for use therein|

---

DE102004017714B4|2003-12-10|2015-10-15|GFE-Gesellschaft für Fertigungstechnik und Entwicklung Schmalkalden/Chemnitz mbH|Adjustment and adjustment system for strip-shaped blade carriers on cutting tools|

---

SE526645C2|2004-02-20|2005-10-18|Sandvik Intellectual Property|groove cutter|

---

CN1287938C|2004-08-19|2006-12-06|株洲硬质合金集团有限公司|Face and side cutter|

---

DE102005025000A1|2005-06-01|2006-12-07|Kennametal Inc.|Tool with fine adjustment|

---

AT8743U1|2005-10-19|2006-12-15|Ceratizit Austria Gmbh|MILLING TOOL|

---

US7390151B2|2006-03-14|2008-06-24|Great Lakes Custom Tool Mfg., Inc.|Helical cutter head and helical cutting blade for use therewith|

---

US7708038B1|2006-11-27|2010-05-04|Stewart John S|Substantially helical, stepped blade row cutterhead having removable blade units|

---

US7300231B1|2006-12-04|2007-11-27|Hsing Chao Liu|Cutting tool carrying device for machine tool|

---

US8690494B2|2011-08-10|2014-04-08|Kennametal Inc.|Cutting inserts and cutting tool systems having sinusoidal and helical cutting edges|

---

JP6114974B2|2013-09-13|2017-04-19|住友電工ハードメタル株式会社|Rotary cutting tool|

---

CN104014861B|2014-05-30|2016-08-31|株洲钻石切削刀具股份有限公司|A kind of polish milling cutter|US9511467B2|2013-06-10|2016-12-06|Ford Global Technologies, Llc|Cylindrical surface profile cutting tool and process|

---

US10220453B2|2015-10-30|2019-03-05|Ford Motor Company|Milling tool with insert compensation|

---

EP3698909A1|2019-02-20|2020-08-26|KOMET Deutschland GmbH|Tool for surface finishing|

法律状态:
2017-10-19| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 2 |

---

2018-10-08| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 3 |

---

2020-10-16| ST| Notification of lapse|Effective date: 20200910 |

优先权:

---

申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题

---

US14/928,138|US20170120350A1|2015-10-30|2015-10-30|Milling Inserts|

---