• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    ELECTROMAGNETIC FLEXOR This is an electromagnetic valve comprising a coupler (1 O); a magnet (30a, 30b) having pieces of pole (50a, 50b) defining a space; a flexor joint (40) having an end coupled to the coupler, such that part of the flexor assembly extends into space, the flexor assembly having at least one resilient part formed of a resilient material and at least one magnetizable part, where that part of the flexor assembly extending into space is movable between the pole pieces through an intermediate position towards which it is resiliently tilted so that a resilient mechanical force is generated by flexing the resilient part from from an undetected position; and device (20) for polarizing the magnetizable part of the flexor assembly so that the part of the flexor assembly that is movable between the pole pieces is attracted towards a pole piece by a magnetic force, thus defining a state of valve; where the magnetizable part and the resilient part of the flexor assembly are configured so that the magnetic force defining the valve state is greater than (...).
    公开号:BR112014005753B1
    申请号:R112014005753-2
    申请日:2012-09-12
    公开日:2020-12-29
    发明作者:David Cebon；Andrews Odhams；Neil Houghton；Wladyslaw Wygnanski；Jonathan Miller；Robert David Prescott；Leon Michael Henderson；Laurence John Potter
    申请人:Cambridge Enterprise Ltd；Haldex Brake Products Ltd；Camcon Technology Ltd；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    Field of the Invention
    [001] The present invention generally relates to electromagnetically operated devices, or actuators of the type that use a magnetic field to move an armature or bending from one position to another. More specifically, the present invention relates to bending to a driven torque value suitable for applications, such as fluid flow control. Fundamentals of the Invention
    [002] There are many types of electromagnetically operated devices or actuators that are used today to control the switch contacts and provide open, closed or switching functionality. Typical examples of such devices include those that use flexion or cantilever motion to open and / or close the valves that control a flow of fluid. Many of these valves require a continuous electrical current to maintain the armature in one position or the other. This consumes energy and can produce unwanted heat. To avoid the use of a continuous flow of electric current, actuated binary valves such as the type described in the US Patent were developed. 6,935,373.
    [003] Existing binary valves of the type described in US 6,935,373 operate in a bistable manner or in a fully open state or in a fully closed state, using permanent magnets to maintain the valve in each state. To change the state of the valve, a single short electrical pulse is sent to the coil to reduce, remove or invert the attractive magnetic force, causing the valve to switch states with the aid of a mechanical spring. Such a valve can be controlled using a pulse width modulation transistor-transistor (TTL) signal (PWM), with an edge detection circuit that sends trigger pulses to the coil in response to the edges of the PWM signal.
    [004] In many applications, it is desirable to have valves that can pass high flow rates and switch with short time delays despite high pressure differentials through the seal. Such application is the pneumatic control of truck brakes. In this application, it is desired that the valves have effective orifice diameters up to 9 mm and switching times of 3 ms. In addition, the differential pressures through the valve can be up to 1250 kPa (12.5 bar). This combination of performance parameters is not achieved with conventional valve technologies, which tend to have switching times longer than 15 ms.
    [005] The typical existing binary valves, such as the one shown in FIG. 1, switching times less than 4 ms with a differential pressure of 900 kPa (9 bar), but only for effective orifices with diameters less than 3.5 mm. Such performance is sufficient in applications where small and rapid pressure adjustments are required. However, many applications require higher pressures, flow rates and switching speeds.
    [006] The valve, according to the present invention, was developed to overcome the limitations of the previous binary valves, in such a way that it reached adequate specifications for the pneumatic brake actuation, when placed directly in the brake chamber. This requires pressure changes in the chamber greater than 50 kPa (0.5 bar) at 12.5 Hz with a supply pressure of 1250 kPa (12.5 bar).
    [007] According to the present invention, an electromagnetic valve is provided which comprises: a coupler; a magnet having pieces of pole defining a space; a bending assembly having an end coupled to the coupler, such that part of the bending assembly extends into space, the bending assembly having at least one resilient part formed of a resilient material and at least one magnetizable part, where that part of flexing assembly extending into space is movable between the pole pieces through an intermediate position towards which it is resiliently tilted so that a resilient mechanical force is generated by flexing the resilient part from an undetected position ; and a device for polarizing the magnetizable part of the bending assembly so that the part of the bending assembly that is movable between the pole pieces is attracted towards a pole piece by a magnetic force, thereby defining a valve state; where the magnetizable part and the resilient part of the bending assembly are configured so that the magnetic force defining the valve state is greater than the resilient mechanical force; where the magnetizable part of the bending assembly comprises elements of magnetizable material, where each element comprises regions of reduced permeability separating the elements from the resilient part, and where the elements of magnetizable material do not significantly contribute to the resilient mechanical strength.
    [008] The bending set model for a binary valve involves a compensation between several variables. In order to handle high pressure, the stiffness of the bending assembly must be high. Although the increase in stiffness also increases the response speed of the valve, a rigid bending assembly experiences greater stresses at the root of the cantilever. In addition, the attractive magnetic force, or “tensile force”, needs to overcome the flexural stiffness as the flexion assembly approaches its final stop during valve switching. This requires a large magnetic flux to flow through the bending assembly, implying a large cross-sectional area.
    [009] Normal flexion sets for binary valves tend to have rectangular cross sections, and are designed to balance the conflicting requirements mentioned in the previous paragraph. However, they can only pass a limited magnetic flux, reducing the maximum switching pressure. By including a magnetizable part and the resilient part defined above, the present invention exclusively separates the magnetic flexing functionality from the mechanical functionality, creating more tolerance in the model process and allowing higher levels of performance to be achieved.
    [010] In preferred embodiments, the magnetizable part comprises elements of magnetizable material, for example, 'fingers', such that at least one end of each element comprises regions of reduced permeability separating the elements from the resilient part. These elements of magnetizable material may or may not be separate parts from the resilient part. The separation of the elements from magnetizable material allows the bending assembly to curve without interference from the elements, but also allows the magnetic flux to flow along the elements and through small regions of reduced permeability at one or more ends of the elements.
    [011] The bending assembly may consist of a single part as shown, for example, in FIGs. 10a and 10b described below. Examples of bending assemblies consisting of more parts will be given, for example, in FIGs. 10c and 10d described below. Next, the terms 'flexion' and 'flexion set' are used interchangeably. Brief Description of Drawings
    [012] The examples of devices according to the present invention will now be described with reference to the attached drawings, in which:
    [013] FIGS. 1A and 1B show a schematic of a driven binary valve with a 1.75 mm diameter orifice, and an overlapping diagram of the relevant magnetic circuit model.
    [014] FIGS. 2A to 2D show four general stages that can be identified when switching a driven binary valve.
    [015] FIG. 3 shows a driven binary valve in accordance with the present invention.
    [016] FIG. 4 lists the preferred specifications for a high performance pneumatic brake valve in accordance with the present invention.
    [017] FIG. 5 is a schematic drawing of bending at a binary valve.
    [018] FIG. 6 schematically shows a valve configuration for pneumatic brakes.
    [019] FIG. 7 shows a B-H curve for cold rolled steel.
    [020] FIG. 8 is a graph showing the maximum switching pressure for different coil configurations during static tests.
    [021] FIG. 9 is a graph showing the maximum switching pressure for different bending thicknesses and coil configurations during static tests.
    [022] FIG. 10 shows the alternative bending models that can be used on a valve according to the present invention.
    [023] FIG. 11A shows a perspective view of a cut-out bending model.
    [024] FIG. 11B shows a front view of a cut-out bending model, including a front view of the bending poles.
    [025] FIG. 12 is a graph showing the maximum switching pressure for different bending and coil configurations during static tests.
    [026] FIG. 13 shows a number of other possible bending models that can be used on a valve, in accordance with the present invention.
    [027] FIG. 14 shows a possible additional model according to the invention.
    [028] FIG. 15 is another graph that shows the maximum switching pressure for different bending and coil configurations during static tests. Detailed Description of the Invention
    [029] FIG. 1 shows an existing driven binary valve comprising a steel frame 1, a coil 2 and the strong permanent magnets 3. The only movable part of the valve is flexion 4, which is a cantilever that is held bistably against either of the two poles 5th; 5b via the permanent magnets 3. The steel frame transfers the magnetic flux from the permanent magnets 3 to the poles 5a; 5b. Alternatively, the permanent magnets 3 can be placed in series with the poles 5a; 5b.
    [030] When flexion 4 is maintained against the lower pole 5b, it blocks an orifice 6 and the valve is then closed. The diameter of orifice 6 in this existing valve is 1.75 mm. When flexion 4 is maintained against the upper pole 5a, the valve is fully opened. To cause the flexion to switch states, a brief electrical pulse is sent to coil 2 to reduce, remove or invert the attractive magnetic force which, combined with the mechanical flexion stiffness 4, pulls the flexion 4 into the opposite state. Flexion 4 stores some kinetic energy that would normally be lost in a conventional solenoid valve, converting the kinetic energy into potential energy as flexion 4 reaches the opposite pole 5a or 5b. This also softens the seating of flexion 4, increasing the life of the hardware.
    [031] FIG. 2 schematically represents four general stages that can be identified during the switching of a driven binary valve: Flexion traction for its base; Seal; Flexion release from its base; and Flexion switching.
    [032] The four stages are described in more detail below. It is assumed that the valve is submerged in a high pressure reservoir (not shown), and that a low pressure reservoir (also not shown) is coupled to its orifice 6. Then, the pressure force tends to help seal the valve once it is closed. Note, however, that it is possible to configure the valve in such a way that the pressure force tends to open said valve instead of tending to close it. A) The first switching stage of the valve is shown in FIG. 2A. A magnetic force Fm, opposes an elastic bending force, Fr, to pull the bending to its base. Considering a rectangular cross-section bending, Ff can be approximated by:
    Where δ is the cantilever deflection of its neutral point at the center of its pitch, Ef is the Young's Modulus of the bending material, bf is the bending width, tf is its thickness, and Lf is the cantilever length of the application of force. Magnetic force is often simplified to:
    Where Ba is the density of magnetic flux in the air between the flexion and the poles, Aa is the characteristic area of the air gap, and μo is the permeability of the free space, which is equal to 4π x 10-7 N / A2. B) The second switching stage of the valve is shown in FIG. 2B. Once the flexion 4 touches the orifice 6, the force of the air pressure, Fp, helps the magnetic force in the compression of the flexion against the base, sealing the orifice. The pressure force is given by:
    Where PH and PL are the pressures in the high and low pressure reservoirs, respectively, and do is the effective orifice diameter. C) The third valve switching stage is shown in FIG. 2C. A solenoid coil has to be activated to modify the magnetic force sufficiently that FP + Fm <Ft + Fc, where Fc is the "coil force", which is used as an illustrative force at this point in the explanation. Preferably, the driven coil completely negates the magnetic force, allowing the entire bending force to exceed the pressure force. The influence of the coil can be roughly described by:
    where Nc is the number of turns of the coil, ic is the current C (indicated by arrows) in the coil, and f (δ) represents a function of the bending position. D) The final switching stage of the valve is shown in FIG. 2D. It is assumed that once the flexion 4 is raised from the orifice, a pressure balance occurs such that there is no pressure force in the flexion. In addition, it is assumed that the pulling force from the magnets is completely eliminated by the influence of the coil. In this case, the flexion movement is dominated by free vibration in its fundamental resonance frequency, fn, which for a rectangular cantilever is given
    where pf is the density of the bending material. It is known that the actual bending movement is influenced by the imbalances between the coil and magnetic forces, by the second order effects of pressure and by the variation in bending geometry.
    [033] An embodiment of a binary valve, according to the present invention, (except for flexion) is shown in FIG. 3. A summary of the preferred specifications for the driven binary valve according to the present invention is given in the table in FIG. 4. The reason behind these specifications is explained in more detail below. It is appreciated that the parameters given in FIG. 4 represent the optimized values determined by the inventors, and that the present invention is not restricted to the nominal parameters given in this example.
    [034] The minimum diameter for a binary valve driven for a pneumatic ABS system, according to the present invention, is 8 mm, with a preferred diameter of 9 mm. Such diameters are large enough to pass the air flows that are sufficient to track variations in demand pressure during a controlled slide stop on a rough surface.
    [035] Typical body hop and wheel lock frequencies for heavy vehicles tend to be in the 3 Hz and 12.5 Hz range, respectively. The PWM frequency requirement can be determined based on the Nyquist sampling theorem known in the Art. With this theorem, a safety factor of 2 is assumed, the PWM frequency of the pneumatic valves is required to be 50 Hz in order to follow the oscillating pressure demands to reject both the hopping of the body and the locking of the wheel.
    [036] Existing pneumatic brake systems can achieve pressure control accuracy of 10-20 kPa (0.1-0.2 bar). To improve this, the ideal precision for the new valves is defined as 5 kPa (0.05 bar). It is further specified that this precision should be achieved within a 200 ms stabilization time. Using gain values of at least 3, a PWM frequency of 50 Hz is assumed, and by restricting the work / rest ratio range to reach a maximum of 15%, a valve in accordance with this would have to take less than 3 ms to change states. The mechanical movement was previously observed to take up to half the switching time of the valve, and, since the mechanical movement constitutes half of a period of free vibration, then the required 3 ms reaction time of the valve indicates that the bending must have a natural frequency greater than 1 / (0.003 s) = 333 Hz.
    [037] The actuated binary valve, according to the present invention, was designed to meet the criteria established in FIG. 4 and described above. It is appreciated, however, that the present invention is not limited to the nominal values, but that these values are the preferred values for this application of valve technology.
    [038] FIG. 5 is a schematic drawing of a "flat" rectangular bending 40 on a binary valve having an orifice 60 of 9 mm in diameter. When flexion is flexed, a space cylinder 65 is created between hole 60 and flexion 4. The surface area of the side of the cylinder needs to be larger than the surface area of the hole, so as not to impede flow. In other words:
    where h is the height of the cylinder.
    [039] The valve, according to the present invention, was also designed to have a theoretically infinite useful life, based on the strength limit of 40% of the final strength of the material -. The stress will be greater at the root of the flexion, and is calculated for an exemplary rectangular flexion 40 using:
    [040] Returning to FIG. 3, the valve comprises a mild steel C-shaped frame, or coupler 10, which has two parts so that different metals could be used for flexion 40 and the coupler 10. It is appreciated that the coupler can have different shapes , some of which are described below. However, the valve could also be made as a single part, multiple parts, or variants of the number of parts shown in FIG. 3. Preferably, the “neck” of the coupler 10 (the part of the coupler between the section within which flexion 40 is fixed and the section that is connected to a magnet and to a pole) is large enough to prevent flow congestion fluid, and ample space is available around flexion 40 by a solenoid coil 20. Strong magnets 30a; 30b, such as neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) magnets, are placed close to poles of shiny mild steel 50a; 50b. However, the magnets could be placed in alternate locations that are in series with poles 50a; 50b as well, such as at the back of the valve or at the necks of the valve.
    [041] Preferably, the poles 50a; 50b are tapered to 'focus' the flow, thereby increasing the magnetic holding force. A hole 60 can be housed in non-magnetic through tubes 61 which are threaded and fixed by locking nuts 71 at the poles 50a; 50b to hold them against magnets 30 and coupler 10. A retainer 51 can also be used in such a way that the flat face of a standard toroidal magnet with a rectangular cross section can be fitted into a coupler whose face is not flat, facilitating the angular adjustments of the pole set, in such a way that the flexion rests on one side of the pole when flexed.
    [042] Intuitively, one could think that the flexural strength should be directed to its maximum to reach maximum Ff and fn through equations (1) and (5). However, this would increase the stress of the cantilever root, as illustrated by equation (7). Furthermore, although equations (2) and (4) suggest that the magnetic circuit in the valve is independent of the valve mechanics, these equations are only first order approximations. In reality, only a finite amount of magnetic permeability is available in a material, restricting the amount of flow that can be transmitted by bending. This attractive magnetic force must overcome the flexural strength during the first switching stage of the valve, when flexion 40 flexes to the opposite pole to provide the appropriate opening area, according to equation (6). It follows that the flexural strength must be small enough for the limited magnetic attraction available to maintain flexion against any pole.
    [043] Flexion 40 in the exemplified embodiment according to the present invention shown in FIG. 3 has a thickness of 1.4 mm and a width of 30 mm. A coil 20 can be wound around flexion 40 using a plastic coil former that features an internal cut large enough to allow free movement of flexion 40 through its path. Rubber O-rings 80 can be used to create a seal between flexion 40 and poles 50a; 50b. The exemplified embodiment of a valve shown in FIG. 3 preferably accommodates an O 80 ring with ds = 1.6 mm, Ds = 12.1 mm, and a compression of up to 0.24 mm. However, other sealing arrangements are possible, with the flexible surface located at flexion 40, or with the flexible surface located at some distance from the pole using a connection connected to the flexion.
    [044] Two V valves, according to FIG. 3, were manufactured for use in an experimental air brake system according to the diagram shown schematically in FIG. 6. The system comprises a DB disc brake and an LC load cell. The arrows indicate the direction of the air flow provided by an AC air compressor, through an inlet I and an outlet O of the system. V valves were used to control the compressor pressure at inlet I and the chamber pressure at outlet O. The finite element simulations suggested that flexion 40 would have a natural frequency of 575 Hz and a stress at the root of the cantilever of 497 Mpa , which is less than the strength limit of the model material. In addition, the simulations suggested that flexion 40 maintained a force of 140 N. Attempts were made to observe the switching of the valve under an applied upward pressure. However, it was concluded that for a flat bending 40 made of EN42 spring steel, the maximum upward pressure under which the valve could be switched was not 1200 kPa (12 bar), but 300 kPa (3 bar). In other words, despite meeting all mechanical requirements, a conventional flat bending 40 made of EN42 spring steel might not meet the magnetic requirements for the valve. Magnetic stainless steel materials have also been tried for bending, but have resulted in lower switching pressures. This occurred despite the fact that the valve has adequate retention force and resistance to bending when tested.
    [045] Considering the reasonable holding force and bending resistance exhibited by the valve, it was theorized that the coil was not changing the magnetic holding force until what was originally experienced. However, this did not explain which aspect of the magnetic model would have to be modified to improve switching. To solve the problem, an optimization of the experimental model of the valve was performed in common with a theoretical analysis based on the magnetic circuit theory.
    [046] The mechanism behind the magnetization of materials is well known in the art. As the strength of the magnetic field applied to the material is increased, small magnetic domains within the material that initially have random orientations become aligned with the applied field. Eventually, all domains become aligned with the applied field. At that point, the material is saturated and responds as a free space to any further increase in the strength of the applied magnetic field. Since the core is now indistinguishable from outside air, most of the additional magnetic flux seeps through the air.
    [047] The saturation phenomenon is generally illustrated through the use of B-H curves, which plot the flux density versus magnetization. The B-H curve used in the theoretical flexion analysis is shown in FIG. 7. The relative permeability of the material, μr, is the local slope of the B-H curve at a given strength of the magnetic field, and provides an indication of how much flow can be passed through the material at a given level of magnetization. It is generally assumed in the technique that μr is a constant value, with the value obtained close to the origin of the B-H graph. This is approximately valid for low flow density values in the material, but not for high flow density values, where the local slope is reduced. The simulations of the valve indicated that the rectangular flexion shown in FIG. 3 was saturated when it was close to the poles.
    [048] Several parameters have been investigated to optimize the flow through the valve, but only the coil and bending are described here for the sake of simplicity, since changing other parameters has not produced significant results. A set of tests was performed to evaluate the performance of different coil configurations. The examined configurations included winding coils in series around the bending, around the poles, around the neck of the coupler, and combinations of these arrangements. Each configuration was tested to increase the currents, capturing the effect of increasing the magnetomotive force on the holding force. The test results are shown in FIG. 8. The currents were derived from the voltage inserted in the coil and the resistance of the coil, which was measured before and after each test.
    [049] Two distinct trends are seen in the results in FIG. 8: one for configurations that included a coil wound around flexion, and one for configurations that included a coil wound around poles or in line with the magnet. When the coil was wound around bending, for example, curves labeled '300 turns around bending only', higher switching pressures were typically found at lower magnetomotive forces compared to when there is no coil around bending . However, winding the coil around the poles appears to have facilitated the higher switching pressures at higher magnetomotive forces, for example, the curve labeled '300 turns around flexion only'. In this case, a clear saturation of the maximum pressure occurs for a magnetomotive force of approximately 2500 Ampere-turns.
    [050] The simulation of the magnetic circuit suggested that winding the coil around the bending is the most efficient arrangement with regard to redirecting the flow to facilitate a change of state of the valve. This is because winding the coil around the bending effectively short-circuits the flow between the two permanent magnets. But, FIG. 8 indicates that the bending saturates at low magnetomotive forces with the coil wrapped around it (a dotted line is drawn in FIG. 8 showing the expected saturation point for these coil configurations). According to the magnetic circuit simulation, winding the coil around the poles is less efficient than winding it around bending. However, with the coil located in series with the permanent magnets, it is postulated that the coil is capable of countering the flow generated by the magnets directly. Consequently, the flow leak is less than one factor and greater than the energy of the coil that can be directed to overcome the permanent magnets, explaining the higher switching pressures found in FIG. 8 for coils in series with magnets at higher magnetomotive forces. Some of this flow is still directed through flexion, although it is eventually saturated.
    [051] By increasing the MMF and changing the locations of the coils, the switching pressure was increased to 600 kPa (6 bar) from the initially achieved value of 300 kPa (3 bar). The maximum switching pressure of 600 kPa (6 bar) achieved with the best coil configuration was still well below the ideal model pressure of 1200 kPa (12 bar). In addition, the switching pressure was achieved for a magnetomotive force of 4500 A.t, which translates into a current of 22.5 A for a coil of 200 turns. Given the 0.5 mm diameter of the wire used, the currents could not be raised much higher to achieve higher switching pressures without melting the coil. Changes to other parameters were then investigated to improve the performance of the valve. These investigations are described below.
    [052] To increase the amount of flow that can be channeled through flexion, its cross-sectional area would have to be increased. In relation to equation (1), the flexural strength refers linearly to its width and cubically to its thickness. It follows that increasing the bending width would have a much less effect on strength than increasing the thickness. This minor effect, in turn, would minimize the amount of extra magnetic force needed to combat resistance. However, the bending width is more than 20 times the thickness in the embodiment shown in FIG. 3. Consequently, increasing the bending width by only a small amount to increase the transverse area would have a significant effect on the physical envelope of the valve when compared to the increase in thickness. Thicker flexions increase the magnetic flux, but also increase the mechanical stiffness and therefore the necessary magnetic retention force. The research was then directed to the invention of a flexion that is effectively thicker in strategic areas, substantially separating its mechanical functionality from the primary magnetic functionality responsible for switching flexion from one state to another.
    [053] The investigation was carried out by means of normal flexion and by attaching 1.1 mm thick 'splinters' of soft steel to it using tape. The chips were short enough to fit between the poles and the rear of the coupler, and the connection was flexible enough that the chips did not significantly affect flexural strength. The tests evaluating the maximum switching pressure that were previously described were then re-run with approximately 15 A sent to coils with 100 and 200 turns wound around the new bending configurations.
    [054] The test results are plotted on the test results for different coil configurations in FIG. 9. It is clear that the thickness of the bending between the poles and the rear of the coupler had a much more dramatic effect on the maximum switching pressure than the optimization of the coil configuration, with a pressure increase of 100% on the best coils. A peculiar result is that increasing the thickness of the flexion on the opposite side of the orifice had a greater effect than increasing the thickness of the flexion on the same side of the orifice. This is counterintuitive, since the opposite pole is more than 1 mm away from flexion, and it would be expected that the majority of the flow would attempt to travel through the adjacent pole to the splinters in flexion. However, increasing the thickness of the opposite side of the hole brings the chips into the magnetic attraction range of the other pole, encouraging the flexion to switch to the other state.
    [055] New bending arrangements were designed to 'thicken' the bending in a magnetic direction without making it thicker in a mechanical sense (that is, without making it more rigid). Four such models are shown in FIG. 10.
    [056] The first model, in FIG. 10A, involves adding ‘fingers’ to the flexion F1, such that the mechanical stiffness, which is predominantly dictated by the thickness of the flexion in your coil, remains similar to the original flexion model. The fingers are shown in FIG. 10A as an integrated part of the original, flat and rectangular part of the flexion F1, but they can also be separate parts coupled to the flexion, to simplify manufacturing or to allow the use of different materials. The basic section of the central flexing element is 1.30 mm thick and 30 mm wide. The fingers, in this modality, each have a thickness of 1.075 mm, with an air gap of 1 mm that separates said fingers from the main flexion body and a small air gap (<0.5 mm) separating the fingers from the the coupler when the flexion is flexed. As this gap is small, it can still be crossed easily by the magnetic flux. The thickness of the fingers was limited by the need to adjust the entire valve in the previously built pressure chambers. It is appreciated that these are exemplified dimensions of this flexion modality and that the dimensions for other modalities of this model may vary. The FEA simulations suggested that the flexion deflection force would be 120 N, when touching an orifice (decreased by 150 N for completely rectangular flat flexion), the associated stress at the root would be 530 Mpa, and the natural frequency would be 356 Hz. Although the natural frequency was reduced, it was still above the 333 Hz minimum required by the specifications shown in FIG. 4.
    [057] The second model, shown in FIG. 10B, add a chamfer to flexion S, such that flexion S 'embraces' a pole and better direct the flow. Again, the fingers and the chamfer are shown to be integrated with the original flat part of the flexion of FIG. 10B, but can also be made as separate parts coupled to the bending. The thickness of the fixed section was also reduced to that of the central flexion element with a thickness of 1.30 mm. Since the valve would now be easily adjusted in the pressure chambers, the fingers were thickened to 2.1 mm each, retaining its original spacing of 1 mm from the central flexing element and 0.5 mm spacing from the rear of the coupler when flexed. It is appreciated that these are exemplified dimensions of this flexion modality and that the dimensions for other modalities of this model may vary. The deflection force of flexion S was predicted to be 120 N when touching the O-ring, while root stress and natural frequency were simulated to be equal to 432 Mpa and 550 Hz, respectively.
    [058] The third model, shown in FIG. 10C, detach the F2 fingers from the flexion entirely. In this model, the static F2 soft steel fingers of thickness 2.1 mm were fixed between the flexion and the coupler, with the chamfers at the end of the fingers, in such a way that they embrace the poles. It is appreciated that these are exemplified dimensions of this flexion and fingers modality, and that the dimensions for the other modalities of this model may vary. Shims can be placed between the flexion and the fingers to separate them, allowing free movement at the root of the flexion, thus minimally affecting their stiffness. In addition, the fingers can be folded carefully, so that they touch very little flexion along its length when it has been flexed.
    [059] The fourth model, shown in FIG. 10D, has additional fingers oriented in the opposite direction to that of FIGs. 10A and 10B. A small air gap between the fingers and the thickened end of the F3 flexion allows for magnetic flow, but the mechanical stiffness is close to that of flexion without the fingers. The fingers can be integrated parts of the original flat part of the flexion, as shown in FIG. 10D, or they can be separate parts coupled to the bending.
    [060] In the second model shown in FIG. 10B, flexion S with a chamfer seemed the most promising from the theoretical point of view, since the chamfer would provide a large amount of area where the flow could be transferred from a flexion pole. It follows that what was decided to manufacture that model while preliminarily running the tests with the third model. A detailed representation of the chamfered model shown in FIG. 10B is shown in FIG. 11A (perspective view) and 11B (front view). The front view of FIG. 11B shows the flexion S with a chamfer placed below a pole P1. The pole P1 is formed from one part, and is shown in section view, so that the hole can be seen. The preferred material for fabricating bevel bends can be EN42 spring steel, however, other materials can be used.
    [061] The speed tests performed with bevel bending shown in FIGs. 10B and 11 showed that the valve took 2.5 to 3 ms to switch states. The tests to determine the maximum switching pressures were performed both with the flexion S featuring a chamfer (FIG. 10B), and with the model featuring F2 fingers fixed between said flexion and the coupler (FIG. 10C). The results are plotted on top of the results for different coil configurations in FIG. 12.
    [062] FIG. 12 shows that the model with the F2 fixed fingers increased the switching pressure by 430 kPa (4.3 bar) over the best coil configuration, while the bending S with chamfer performed even better, increasing the switching pressure to 580 kPa (5.8 bar) on the best coil configuration. These test results further confirmed the previous deduction that the steeper gradient of switching pressure versus the magnetomotive force curves occurs when there is no saturation of the flexion. Although FIG. 12 show only the test results for up to 900 kPa (9 bar), it is conceivable that the model with a pressure of 1200 kPa (12 bar), initially specified for the valve, could be achieved by flexing S with a chamfer with a magnetomotive force more elevated.
    [063] The valve, according to the present invention, can be used in many applications requiring fast switching to turn the flow of a liquid or gas on and off. These applications include air brakes, hydraulic and pneumatic actuators, and other applications where rapid switching of a fluid flow (and optionally pulse width modulation) can be used to control mechanical systems.
    [064] FIG. 13 shows a number of possible bending models that can be used, in addition to those shown in FIG. 10 and 11, in a valve, according to the present invention. The model shown in FIG. 13G includes chips 100 of magnetic material connected to the central flexion, in such a way that they do not restrict said central flexion from bending.
    [065] FIG. 14 shows an additional bending model in accordance with the present invention. FIG. 14C shows a section view of the flexion and the pole. The flexion Z has a fixed part A, a resilient part B, a flat part C and a base D. In addition, the flexion Z has fingers E, and a magnetic coupling to said fingers F. Similar to FIG. 10D, the E fingers protrude from the fixed flexion region. This reduces the mass of the mobile part of the flexion compared to the flexion S, then increasing its natural frequency according to equation (5). The parts of the fingers E adjacent to the fixed part A of the flexion are also fixed, and the parts of the fingers E adjacent to the resilient part B of the flexion are not fixed. All A-E components can be manufactured together, but they can also be made as separate parts coupled together. Making the A-E components as separate parts would allow for individual consideration of magnetic permeability, mass, corrosion resistance, strength and ease of manufacture for each part, as well as flexion as a whole.
    [066] In the model shown in FIG. 14, the flat part and the base are separated by the protruding ring element e. This element can be coupled, or formed integrally with the flat part or the base. At least one protruding element and can be used on either side of the flat part. In addition, the pole P1 in this model is formed by a magnetic part G, and a non-magnetic part H. The non-magnetic part H includes another protruding element f, which can be attached or formed integrally with the non-magnetic part H of the pole. The protruding element f can press on the rubber element, creating a seal. Advantageously, the diameter of that seal would only be at most the orifice diameter, and consequently less than the diameter of a seal created by a rubber O-ring integrated into the pole (for example, FIG. 11B). The smaller diameter seal would reduce the pressure force according to equation (3), and as in FIG. 2 c shows, a lower pressure force would require a lower magnetomotive force from the coil to cause the bending to switch states.
    [067] The height of the protruding element and the flat part C of the flexion can be dimensioned to provide stress relief in the rubber seal, limiting the amount of the protruding element f in the pole that presses the rubber. The height of the protruding and flexing element can be used to adjust the air gap between the flat part C of the flexion and the face of the pole, when the valve is in a given state. Preventing metal-to-metal contact between the flat part and the face of the pole, including a small air gap, can significantly reduce the magnetic holding force, and therefore the magnetomotive force required by the coil to switch states. It should be noted that, in this type of valve, the protruding element does not create a magnetic circuit with the non-magnetic part of the H pole, when they touch.
    [068] The protruding element and may include one or more 'slots' g, as shown in FIG. 14B, in order to ventilate the air in the small annular volume created between the protruding and flexing element and the protruding element f in the pole, when the valve is closed.
    [069] The thickness of the flat part D of the flexion in FIG. 14 is dimensioned preferably in such a way that it transports the required flow without saturation, and without compromising the mass and the dynamic properties of the flexion. The thickness was 3.5 mm in this flexion mode. The thickness of the resilient part B of the flexion is designed to achieve a given resilient mechanical strength, and was 1.16 mm in this flexion modality. The thickness of the E fingers is designed to prevent magnetic saturation of the flexion, and was 2.35 mm in this flexion mode. The thickness of the fixed part A of the flexion is designed to provide a gap between the main resilient part B and the fingers E. This thickness was 3.4 mm in this flexion mode. It is appreciated that these are exemplified dimensions of this flexion modality and that the dimensions for other modalities of this model may vary. Suitable values can be selected using equations (1-7).
    [070] In summary, the Z flexion, in FIG. 14, has an improved base model, benefits from unnecessary material being removed, and is made up of multiple parts, which results in improved fabrication, reduced size and weight, while providing greater holding force, but a chain of minor switching (magnetomotive force). This model provides substantially improved switching performance.
    [071] FIG. 15 shows the test results (switching pressure versus magnetomotive force curves) for three types of flexions: the Z flexion shown in FIG. 14, a standard ‘flat’ bending 40 and bevel bending S1 (of the type shown in FIGS. 10B and 11). It can be seen from FIG. 15 that, at a magnetomotive force of 700, the Z flexion increased the switching pressure by approximately 1000 kPa (10 bar) compared to the bevel flexion S and the ‘flat’ standard flexion 40.
    [072] Although FIGs. 10, 11, 13 and 14 provide a sample of possible forms of flexion that can be used, it is appreciated that said flexions, according to the present invention, are not limited to the physical forms shown in these figures.
    权利要求:
    Claims (18)
    [0001]
    1. Electromagnetic valve, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that it comprises: a coupler (10); a magnet having pieces of pole defining a space; a bending assembly (40) having an end coupled to the coupler, so that part of the bending assembly extends into the space, the bending assembly having at least one resilient part formed of a resilient material and at least one magnetizable part , where that part of the flexing assembly extending into the space is movable between the pole pieces through an intermediate position towards which it is resiliently tilted so that a resilient mechanical force is generated by deflecting the resilient part from an unflexed position; and a device for polarizing the magnetizable part of the bending assembly so that the part of the bending assembly that is movable between the pole pieces is attracted towards a pole piece by a magnetic force, thereby defining a valve state; wherein the magnetizable part and the resilient part of the bending assembly are configured so that the magnetic force that defines the valve state is greater than the resilient mechanical force; wherein the magnetizable part of the bending assembly comprises elements of magnetizable material, where each element comprises regions of reduced permeability separating the elements from the resilient part, and where the elements of magnetizable material do not significantly contribute to the resilient mechanical strength.
    [0002]
    2. Electromagnetic valve, according to claim 1, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that the regions of reduced permeability are located at the ends of the elements of magnetizable material.
    [0003]
    3. Electromagnetic valve, according to claim 1 or 2, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that the elements of magnetizable material are coupled to the resilient part.
    [0004]
    4. Electromagnetic valve, according to any one of the preceding claims, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that the elements of magnetizable material extend from one end of the flexing assembly (40) opposite the end of the flexing assembly coupled to the coupler (10 ) and movable between the pole pieces, so that the regions of reduced permeability are located at opposite ends of the elements of magnetizable material and separate the elements of the coupler.
    [0005]
    5. Electromagnetic valve according to any one of claims 1 to 3, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that the elements of magnetizable material extend from the end of the bending assembly (40) coupled to the coupler (10) so that the regions of reduced permeability separate the elements of magnetizable material from one end of the flexing assembly opposite the end of the flexing assembly which is coupled to the coupler and movable between the pole pieces.
    [0006]
    6. Electromagnetic valve, according to any one of the preceding claims, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that the end of the main flexion set (40) movable between the pole pieces is of greater thickness than the resilient part.
    [0007]
    7. Electromagnetic valve, according to any one of the preceding claims, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that at least one resilient element is coupled or integrally formed with the part of the movable flexing assembly between the pole pieces.
    [0008]
    8. Electromagnetic valve, according to any of the preceding claims, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that the resilient element is contained within at least one protruding element in the magnetizable part of the flexing assembly that is mobile between the pole pieces.
    [0009]
    9. Electromagnetic valve, according to any of the preceding claims, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that the protruding element in the magnetizable part of flexion includes at least one slot.
    [0010]
    10. Electromagnetic valve, according to any of the preceding claims, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that a set of pole pieces includes a protruding element that can press inwards the resilient element, creating a seal.
    [0011]
    11. Electromagnetic valve, according to any of the previous claims, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that a piece of pole is made of separate parts that may or may not be of different magnetic permeabilities.
    [0012]
    12. Electromagnetic valve, according to any of the previous claims, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that the orifice is housed in a passage tube.
    [0013]
    13. Electromagnetic valve, according to any one of the preceding claims, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that the magnetizable part comprises a chamfer.
    [0014]
    14. Electromagnetic valve, according to any one of the preceding claims, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that the magnetizable part comprises at least one protruding element and in which at least one piece of pole comprises at least one recess to receive at least one protruding element.
    [0015]
    15. Electromagnetic valve, according to any one of the preceding claims, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that the protruding elements in the mobile magnetizable part between the pole pieces can be designed to create regions of reduced permeability between the magnetizable part and the piece pieces. pole.
    [0016]
    16. Electromagnetic valve, according to any one of the preceding claims, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that the protruding elements in the magnetizable part between the pole pieces can be designed to limit the amount that the protruding element in the set of pole pieces presses the element rubber.
    [0017]
    17. Electromagnetic valve, according to any of the preceding claims, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that the flexion set consists of a single part.
    [0018]
    (18) Electromagnetic valve, according to any one of the preceding claims, CHARACTERIZED by the fact that the flexion set consists of more than one part.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    BR112014005753B1|2020-12-29|electromagnetic valve
    US7626288B2|2009-12-01|Electromagnetic linear drive
    JP5979790B2|2016-08-31|Pilot operated solenoid valve
    DK2567131T3|2019-04-23|ELECTRON MAGNET-DRIVED SWITCHING DEVICES AND PROCEDURES FOR ACTIVATING THEREOF
    EP2472539B1|2016-11-23|Electromagnetic relay
    US20160049230A1|2016-02-18|Magnetic armature
    CA1192249A|1985-08-20|Electro-magnet equipped with a moving systemincluding a permanent magnet and designed formonostable operation
    US20130112904A1|2013-05-09|Solenoid valve with a two-part core
    CN101030507B|2011-03-16|Electromagnetic release
    US6870285B2|2005-03-22|Long stroke linear voice coil actuator with the proportional solenoid type characteristic
    US3893052A|1975-07-01|Shock-resistant indicating device
    US1518020A|1924-12-02|Electromagnet
    EP2434503A1|2012-03-28|Magnetic actuator with a non-magnetic insert
    RU2522891C2|2014-07-20|Magnetic threshold device
    CN103166398B|2016-06-01|There is the electro pneumatic converter of low hysteresis characteristic
    CN105299296B|2018-11-16|Self-holding electromagnetic valve
    JP2005150308A|2005-06-09|Magnetic core
    RU2313716C2|2007-12-27|Electromagnetic valve
    BR0309070A|2005-02-01|Electromagnetic drive
    JP2009529315A|2009-08-13|Electromagnetic actuator with electromagnetically optimized V-shaped permanent magnet
    JPH0648648B2|1994-06-22|Electromagnetic actuator
    JP5394230B6|2014-06-11|Electromagnetic actuator with electromagnetically optimized V-shaped permanent magnet
    Mahajan et al.2013|Saw-tooth pole solenoid actuator for aerospace applications
    Lim et al.2005|Permanent Magnet Overhang Effect in Permanent Magnetic Actuator Using 3 Dimension Equivalent Magnetic Circuit network Method
    JPH10122419A|1998-05-15|Shut-off valve
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    US20150260303A1|2015-09-17|
    CN104145149A|2014-11-12|
    EP2756215B1|2015-08-12|
    EP2756215A1|2014-07-23|
    US20160091106A9|2016-03-31|
    WO2013038171A1|2013-03-21|
    CN104145149B|2016-07-13|
    CA2848340A1|2013-03-21|
    GB201115726D0|2011-10-26|
    BR112014005753A2|2017-03-28|
    CA2848340C|2020-01-14|
    US9404602B2|2016-08-02|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    GB852171A|1958-08-01|1960-10-26|Gen Controls Co|Electromagnetic operator|
    JPS6153586B2|1981-08-07|1986-11-18|Aisin Seiki|
    DE3334160C2|1983-09-21|1986-07-24|Sauer, Otto, 6800 Mannheim|magnetic valve|
    US4685652A|1985-11-04|1987-08-11|Robertshaw Controls Company|Valve construction and method of making the same|
    DE19611517C2|1996-03-23|1999-04-29|Festo Ag & Co|magnetic valve|
    DE59811319D1|1997-06-09|2004-06-09|Buerkert Werke Gmbh & Co|MINIATURIZED SOLENOID VALVE|
    DE29824475U1|1998-03-25|2001-03-22|Kuhnke Gmbh Kg H|Electrically controllable valve|
    DE29822959U1|1998-12-23|1999-05-12|Buerkert Werke Gmbh & Co|Control for fluid|
    DE29901855U1|1999-02-03|1999-04-08|Buerkert Werke Gmbh & Co|Fluidic control|
    GB0016505D0|2000-07-06|2000-08-23|Wygnanski Wladyslaw|Improved electro-magnetic device|
    EP1841993A1|2005-01-13|2007-10-10|Imi Vision Limited|Valve|
    DE202006006825U1|2006-04-27|2007-08-30|Bürkert Werke GmbH & Co. KG|Valve with an electromagnetic drive|
    CN201487362U|2009-06-19|2010-05-26|黄艳芳|Energy-saving constant pressure electromagnetic valve|
    US9328839B2|2014-01-08|2016-05-03|Honeywell International Inc.|High-temperature torque motor actuator|DE102014115207A1|2014-10-20|2016-04-21|Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Nutzfahrzeuge GmbH|A valve sealing device for a tilting-armature valve and method for producing a valve-sealing device for a tilting-armature valve|
    DE102016203024A1|2016-02-26|2017-08-31|Zf Friedrichshafen Ag|Electromagnetic valve with spring tongues|
    GB2568773A|2017-11-21|2019-05-29|Haldex Brake Prod Ab|A valve and valve assembly|
    GB2568546A|2017-11-21|2019-05-22|Haldex Brake Prod Ab|A valve and valve component|
    DE102018206549B4|2018-04-27|2020-02-20|Conti Temic Microelectronic Gmbh|Pneumatic solenoid valve|
    GB2583697A|2019-04-08|2020-11-11|Haldex Brake Prod Ab|Control and monitoring method for a vale|
    EP3747716A1|2019-06-03|2020-12-09|Haldex Brake Products Aktiebolag|Pneumatic vehicle axle brake assembly|
    WO2019170925A2|2019-06-03|2019-09-12|Haldex Brake Products Aktiebolag|Electropneumatic brake system for a utility vehicle and utility vehicle comprising an electropneumatic brake system|
    EP3798072B1|2019-09-26|2021-10-13|Haldex Brake Products Aktiebolag|Brake system for a commercial vehicle|
    EP3808619A1|2019-10-18|2021-04-21|Haldex Brake Products Aktiebolag|Autonomously driven vehicle|
    DE202019106881U1|2019-12-10|2021-03-11|Haldex Brake Products Aktiebolag|Brake system of a commercial vehicle|
    DE202019107179U1|2019-12-20|2021-03-23|Haldex Brake Products Aktiebolag|Commercial vehicle brake valve actuator and commercial vehicle brake valve|
    DE202020104139U1|2020-07-17|2021-10-20|Haldex Brake Products Aktiebolag|Swivel armature brake valve actuator|
    GB2597744A|2020-07-31|2022-02-09|Haldex Brake Prod Ab|Valve and valve component|
    DE202021103036U1|2021-06-04|2021-07-20|Haldex Brake Products Aktiebolag|Vehicle wheel control unit and steering and / or braking system of a vehicle|
    法律状态:
    2018-12-11| B06F| Objections, documents and/or translations needed after an examination request according art. 34 industrial property law|
    2019-10-01| B06U| Preliminary requirement: requests with searches performed by other patent offices: suspension of the patent application procedure|
    2020-09-08| B09A| Decision: intention to grant|
    2020-12-29| B16A| Patent or certificate of addition of invention granted|Free format text: PRAZO DE VALIDADE: 20 (VINTE) ANOS CONTADOS A PARTIR DE 12/09/2012, OBSERVADAS AS CONDICOES LEGAIS. |
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    GB1115726.0|2011-09-12|
    GBGB1115726.0A|GB201115726D0|2011-09-12|2011-09-12|Electromagnetic flexure|
    PCT/GB2012/052241|WO2013038171A1|2011-09-12|2012-09-12|Electromagnetic flexure|
    [返回顶部]